DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc., 123 N.W.2d 695.

32 citing documents.

  • McConville v. City of St. Paul 528 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1995
  • McConville v. City of St. Paul 528 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1995
    Danens & Son, Inc., 266 Minn. 420, 424
  • Rademaker v. Archer Daniels Midland Co. 247 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1976
  • Rademaker v. Archer Daniels Midland Co. 247 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1976
    The principal cases relied upon by ADM are Nepstad v. Lambert, 235 Minn. 1 , Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , Guhlke v. Roberts Truck Lines, 268 Minn. 141 , Ismil v. L. H. Sowles Co. 295 Minn. 120 , and St.
  • Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Weber 245 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1976
  • Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Weber 245 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1976
    See, e. g., Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , and Guhlke v. Roberts Truck Lines, 268 Minn. 141
  • Speaks, Inc. v. Jensen 243 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1976
  • Speaks, Inc. v. Jensen 243 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1976
    1 See, Castner v. Christgau, 222 Minn. 61 , Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , Restatement, Agency 2d, § 220.
  • Wild v. Rarig 234 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1975
  • Wild v. Rarig 234 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1975
    Castner v. Christgau, 222 Minn. 61 , Willner v. Wallinder Sash & Door Co. 224 Minn. 361 , Gill v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 228 Minn. 164 , Nicholas v. Hennepin Wheel Goods Co. 239 Minn. 269 , Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , Boland v. Morrill, 270 Minn. 86 , Restatement, Agency (2d) §§ 2 and 220; 11B Dunnell, Dig.
  • Austin-St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co. v. Belshan 211 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1973
  • Austin-St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co. v. Belshan 211 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1973
    Belshan’s policy with plaintiff insurer provides: “This policy does not apply: * * ‡ * * “* * * to bodily injury to any farm employee * * The trial court held that Orwick was an independent contractor, acknowledging, however, that the issue presented “a rather close fact question.” In seeking reversal, the plaintiff relies on Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , Milbank Mutual Ins.
  • Mutual Creamery Insurance Company v. Gaylord 186 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1971
  • Mutual Creamery Insurance Company v. Gaylord 186 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1971
    In considering the issue raised, we are guided by the rule in Hillesheim v. Stippel, 283 Minn. 59 , 166 N. W. (2d) 325 , and Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Sons, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , 123 N. W. (2d) 695 , that the word “employee” as used in automobile liability policies should not be given a meaning inconsistent with its meaning for workmen’s compensation purposes.
  • Debold v. H. P. Martell & Sons 183 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1971
  • Debold v. H. P. Martell & Sons 183 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1971
    7 , 87 N. W. (2d) 646 ; Tretter v. Dart Transit Co. 271 Minn. 131 , 135 N. W. *116 (2d) 484; Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Mount v. City of Redwood Falls, 260 Minn. 16 , 108 N. W. (2d) 443 ; Geerdes v. J. R. Watkins Co. 258 Minn. 254 , 103 N. W. (2d) 641 ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , 123 N. W. (2d) 695 .
  • Toughill v. Melcher 179 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1970
  • Toughill v. Melcher 179 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1970
    In the more recent case of Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , 123 N. W. (2d) 695 , decedent employee’s trustee was denied recovery in an action for death by wrongful act.
  • Hillesheim v. Stippel 166 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 1969
  • Hillesheim v. Stippel 166 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 1969
    In Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , 123 N. W. (2d) 695 , we concluded that many of the cases involving a determination of the existence of an employer-employee relationship involved the right to recover workmen’s compensation benefits, and we declined to construe the word “employee” in an action to recover damages for death by wrongful act in a manner
  • Knott v. Soltau 166 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1969
  • Knott v. Soltau 166 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1969
    Bituminous relies on Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , 123 N. W. (2d) 695 .
  • MILBANK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Biss 161 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1968
  • MILBANK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Biss 161 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1968
    Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , 123 N.W.
  • Greenlee v. Drees 144 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1966
  • Greenlee v. Drees 144 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1966
    1 Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , 123 N. W. (2d) 695 ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Tretter v. Dart Transit Co. 271 Minn. 131 , 135 N. W. (2d) 484 ; Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co. 169 Minn. 329 , ; Rick v. Noble, 196 Minn. 185 , ; Geerdes v. J. R. Watkins Co. 258 Minn. 254 , 103 N. W. (2d
  • Tretter v. Dart Transit Co. 135 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
  • Tretter v. Dart Transit Co. 135 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
    Relator relies principally on Elwell v. Fake, 264 Minn. 329 , 119 N. W. (2d) 19 , and Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , 123 N. W. (2d) 695 .
  • Boland v. Morrill 132 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1965
  • Boland v. Morrill 132 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1965
    In Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420, 425 , 123 N. W. (2d) 695, 698 , we recently had occasion to examine this question and indicated that there might be merit also in the “nature of the work” test, but we did not feel compelled to adopt it as the test in that case.
  • Guhlke v. Roberts Truck Lines 128 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1964
  • Guhlke v. Roberts Truck Lines 128 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1964
    2 See, Mount v. City of Redwood Falls, 260 Minn. 16 , 108 N. W. (2d) 443 ; Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , 123 N. W. (2d) 695 .