DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lott v. Davidson, 109 N.W.2d 336.

57 citing documents.

  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
  • State v. Caulfield 722 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Caulfield 722 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 2006
    2001) (citing Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130, 141-42 , ).
  • Rukavina v. Pawlenty 684 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • Rukavina v. Pawlenty 684 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130
  • State v. Pearson 633 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Pearson 633 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130, 141-42
  • Claude v. Collins 518 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1994
  • Claude v. Collins 518 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1994
    See Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130, 143 , (a person may not question the constitutionality of a law which does not affect him personally).
  • Paulson v. Lapa, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • Paulson v. Lapa, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130, 143
  • State v. Traczyk 421 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Traczyk 421 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1988
    Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130, 143 , Head v. Special School Dist.
  • In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    In concert with this rule is the principle that a person may not question the constitutionality of a law which does not affect him personally, Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130 , but may only raise the issue if the statutory provision has been applied to his disadvantage.
  • State v. Willis 332 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Willis 332 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1983
    See, e.g., Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130, 141-2 , (legislature has power to create presumption of due care in certain negligence actions); Burke v. Lacock, 41 Minn. 250, 253-4 , 42 N.W.
  • State v. Colsch 284 N.W.2d 839 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Colsch 284 N.W.2d 839 Minn. 1979
    See, Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130
  • Jensen v. Peterson 264 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1978
  • Jensen v. Peterson 264 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1978
    Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130
  • Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
  • Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
    See, Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130
  • Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
  • Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
    5 See, e. g., Marcum v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co. 225 Minn. 139 , (references to permanence of injury when there was no evidence to support claim of permanence); Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219 , (“golden rule” argument on damages); Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130 , (appeals to sympathy).
  • Midland Glass Company, Inc. v. City of Shakopee 226 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1975
  • Midland Glass Company, Inc. v. City of Shakopee 226 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1975
    “The power of the court to declare a law unconstitutional is to be exercised only when absolutely necessary in a particular case.” Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130, 143
  • Daly v. State, Department of Highways 207 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1973
  • Daly v. State, Department of Highways 207 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1973
    See, Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130
  • Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. City of Minneapolis 198 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 1972
  • Seivert v. Bass 181 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1970
  • Seivert v. Bass 181 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1970
    The following cases support the jury’s determination that defendant Christians’ negligence was not a proximate cause of the accident and the alleged resulting injuries and damages: Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 ; Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130 , 109 N. W. (2d) 336 .
  • Minnesota Association of Public Schools v. Hanson 178 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1970
  • Minnesota Association of Public Schools v. Hanson 178 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1970
    Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130 , 109 N. W. (2d) 336 ; Mesaba Loan Co. v. Sher, 203 Minn. 589 , .
  • Jorgensen v. Hawton 161 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1968
  • Jorgensen v. Hawton 161 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1968
    Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130, 136 , 109 N. W. (2d) 336, 341 ; Dahling v. Dammann, 251 Minn. 171 , 87 N. W. (2d) 25 .
  • Jones v. Peterson 156 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1968
  • Jones v. Peterson 156 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1968
    Although we recognize the force of this contention (see, Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115 , 111 N. W. [2d] 345; Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130 , 109 N. W. [2d] 336; Lustik v. Rankila, 269 Minn. 515 , 131 N. W. [2d] 741), we believe it has no application where the negligence of the deceased driver appears as unequivocally as in this case.
  • Huisinga Farms, Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 154 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1967
  • Huisinga Farms, Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 154 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1967
    Shastid v. Shue, 247 Minn. 314 , 77 N. W. (2d) 273 ; State, by Lord, v. Hayden Miller Co. 263 Minn. 29 , 116 N. W. (2d) 535 ; Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130 , 109 N. W. (2d) 336 ; 14 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Colgan v. Raymond 146 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1966
  • Colgan v. Raymond 146 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1966
    (3 ed.) § 7102; Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130 , 109 N. W. (2d) 336 ; Smith v. G. N. Ry.
  • Shacter v. Richter 135 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1965
  • Shacter v. Richter 135 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1965
    In the concurring opinions in Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115 , 111 N. W. (2d) 345 , and in Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130 , 109 N. W. (2d) 336 , we pointed out that because of varying rules as to presumptions, standards of care, conflicting rules of evidence, and disparate instructions, as well as other elements of trial, consolidation has in some cases resulted in “more complicated trials, with perverse verdicts.” ( 261 Minn. 129 , 111
  • Rauk v. Vold 127 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1964
  • Rauk v. Vold 127 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1964
    State v. Anderson, 261 Minn. 431 , 113 N. W. (2d) 4 ; Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130 , 109 N. W. (2d) 336 ; Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 ; Zurko v. Gilquist, 241 Minn. 1 , 62 N. W. (2d) 351 ; Lieberman v. Korsh, 264 Minn. 234 , 119 N. W. (2d) 180 ; Danielson v. St.
  • Martinco v. Hastings 122 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1963
  • Martinco v. Hastings 122 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1963
    See, Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130, 139 , 109 N. W. (2d) 336, 342 .
  • State v. Dietz 119 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1963
  • State v. Dietz 119 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1963
    4 See, also, Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130 , 109 N. W. (2d) 336 .