Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lindgren v. Voge, 109 N.W.2d 754.

31 citing documents.

James R. Martin, Patrick S. Martin v. Mid-America Festivals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2023
James R. Martin, Patrick S. Martin v. Mid-America Festivals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2023
They rely on caselaw stating that the owner of a public amusement park has “an affirmative duty to make it reasonably safe for patrons,” Doe v. Brainerd Int’l Raceway, Inc., which includes taking “care and active vigilance in protecting their patrons against perils,”
Gum v. Medcalf Orthopaedic Appliance Co. 380 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gum v. Medcalf Orthopaedic Appliance Co. 380 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In a civil action, plaintiffs are not required to prove their case beyond a doubt; “all that plaintiffs are required to do is to make it appear to be more probable that the injury came in whole or in part from the defendant’s negligence than from any other cause.” Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262, 269
Julian Johnson Construction Corp. v. Parranto 352 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Julian Johnson Construction Corp. v. Parranto 352 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262, 269 , -60 (1961).
Rieger v. Zackoski 321 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1982
Rieger v. Zackoski 321 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1982
Yogerst v. Janish; Hanson v. Christensen; Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262
Yogerst v. Janish 226 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1975
Yogerst v. Janish 226 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1975
Minn. 262, 271, , 88 A. L. R. 2d 1080, 1089 (1961), for the proposition ( 275 Minn. 210 , ): “* * * the proprietor must exercise a high degree of care for the safety of his patrons; that the standard of care is reasonable care, meaning care commensurate with the risks involved; and that the law requires of owner
Rehberger v. Project Plumbing Co., Inc. 205 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1973
Rehberger v. Project Plumbing Co., Inc. 205 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1973
See, Sandvik v. Jammes, 281 Minn. 85 , Hanson v. Christensen, 275 Minn. 204 , Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262
Filipczak v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 110 195 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1972
Filipczak v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 110 195 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1972
Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262 , concerned injury to a patron at a race track, a paid amusement place, with notice of condition clearly discoverable.
Jacoboski v. Prax 187 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1971
Jacoboski v. Prax 187 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1971
Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262 , 109 N. W. (2d) 754 .
Schunk v. Wieland 176 N.W.2d 119 Minn. 1970
Schunk v. Wieland 176 N.W.2d 119 Minn. 1970
Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262 , 109 N. W. (2d) 754 , 88 A. L. R. (2d) 1080.
Sandvik v. Jammes 160 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1968
Sandvik v. Jammes 160 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1968
However, as we said in Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262, 269 , 109 N. W. (2d) 754, 759 , 88 A. L. R. (2d) 1080: “It was not incumbent upon the plaintiffs to show by direct evidence the exact manner and cause of the injury; this may appear from the circumstances of the case.
White v. Northwestern Bank Building Company 160 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1968
Muckler v. Buchl 150 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
Muckler v. Buchl 150 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262 , 109 N. W. (2d) 754 , 88 A. L. R. (2d) 1080; MacIntosh v. G. N. Ry.
Hanson v. Christensen 145 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1966
Hanson v. Christensen 145 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1966
In Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262 , 109 N. W. (2d) 754 , 88 A. L. R. (2d) 1080, plaintiff was a patron of a public place of entertainment and amusement when injured and we held that the proprietor must exercise a high degree of care for the safety of his patrons; that the standard of care is reasonable care, meaning care commensurate with the risks in
Beckel v. Alexander 134 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1965
Beckel v. Alexander 134 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1965
(3 ed.) § 7047, 3 Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262 , 109 N. W. (2d) 754 , 88 A. L. R. (2d) 1080.
Diker v. City of St. Louis Park 130 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1964
Diker v. City of St. Louis Park 130 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1964
See, Danielson v. Reeves, 211 Minn. 491 , 1 N. W. (2d) 597 ; Ackerman v. Motor Sales & Service Co. 217 Minn. 309 , 14 N. W. (2d) 345 ; Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262 , 109 N. W. (2d) 754 , 88 A. L. R. (2d) 1080.
Ulrich v. Minneapolis Boxing and Wrestling Club, Inc. 129 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1964
Ulrich v. Minneapolis Boxing and Wrestling Club, Inc. 129 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1964
2 175 Minn. 563 , ; Ingerson v. Shattuck School, 185 Minn. 16 , ; Johnson v. Amphitheatre Corp. 206 Minn. 282 , ; Danielson v. Reeves, 211 Minn. 491 , 1 N. W. (2d) 597 ; Connolly v. The Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373 , 95 N. W. (2d) 657 , 74 A. L. R. (2d) 1227; Ruehling v. American Legion Pavilion, Inc. 255 Minn. 391 , 96 N. W. (2d) 702 ; Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262 , 109 N. W. (2d) 754 , 88 A. L. R. (2d) 1080.