DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc., 111 N.W.2d 345.

28 citing documents.

  • Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
  • Winona National & Savings Bank v. Dahlen Transport Co. 256 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1977
  • Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
    602.04 led to this court’s decision in Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc., 261 Minn. 115
  • Winona National & Savings Bank v. Dahlen Transport Co. 256 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1977
    Lustik v. Rankila, 269 Minn. 515 , Lambach v. Northwest Refining Co., Inc., 261 Minn. 115
  • Steinhaus v. Adamson 201 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1972
  • Steinhaus v. Adamson 201 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1972
    In Lambach v. Northwest Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115 , a suit brought to recover for the death of an individual was consolidated with one brought against the representative of his estate.
  • Benson v. Dunham 174 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1970
  • Benson v. Dunham 174 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1970
    Roeck v. Halvorson, 254 Minn. 394 , 95 N. W. (2d) 172 ; Krafft v. Hirt, 260 Minn. 296 , 110 N. W. (2d) 14 ; Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115 , 111 N. W. (2d) 345 .
  • Shapiro v. Bruvold 170 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1969
  • Shapiro v. Bruvold 170 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1969
    Both of said briefs relied in the main upon Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115 , 111 N. W. (2d) 345 .
  • Schwalich v. Guenther 166 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1969
  • Schwalich v. Guenther 166 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1969
    See, Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115, 123 , 111 N. W. (2d) 345, 351 (concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Knutson).
  • Peterson v. MINNEAPOLIS STAR AND TRIBUNE COMPANY 164 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1969
  • Peterson v. MINNEAPOLIS STAR AND TRIBUNE COMPANY 164 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1969
    Co. 238 Minn. 416 , 57 N. W. (2d) 247 , certiorari denied, 346 U. S. 831 , 74 S. Ct. 26 , 98 L. ed. 355; Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115, 121 , 111 N. W. (2d) 345, 349 ; Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427 , 101 N. W. (2d) 918, 921 .
  • Jorgensen v. Hawton 161 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1968
  • Jorgensen v. Hawton 161 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1968
    With respect to the negligence of Jorgensen, upon consolidation of the two actions for trial the Jorgensen trustee waived the presumption of due care, thus avoiding the problems raised in Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115 , 111 N. W. (2d) 345 , and Lustik v. Rankila, 269 Minn. 515 , 131 N. W. (2d) 741 .
  • Jones v. Peterson 156 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1968
  • Jones v. Peterson 156 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1968
    Although we recognize the force of this contention (see, Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115 , 111 N. W. [2d] 345; Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130 , 109 N. W. [2d] 336; Lustik v. Rankila, 269 Minn. 515 , 131 N. W. [2d] 741), we believe it has no application where the negligence of the deceased driver appears as unequivocally as in this case.
  • Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Anderson 139 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1965
  • Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Anderson 139 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1965
    1 See, Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115 , 111 N. W. (2d) 345 .
  • Shacter v. Richter 135 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1965
  • Shacter v. Richter 135 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1965
    In the concurring opinions in Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115 , 111 N. W. (2d) 345 , and in Lott v. Davidson, 261 Minn. 130 , 109 N. W. (2d) 336 , we pointed out that because of varying rules as to presumptions, standards of care, conflicting rules of evidence, and disparate instructions, as well as other elements of trial, consolidation has in some cases resulted in “more compl
  • Lustik v. Rankila 131 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1964
  • Lustik v. Rankila 131 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1964
    A motion to consolidate the two proceedings was denied on the authority of Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115 , 111 N. W. (2d) 345 , which held that because of the statutory presumption of decedent’s due care, § 602.04, it was improper to do so.
  • Tandeski v. Barnard 121 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1963
  • Tandeski v. Barnard 121 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1963
    The trial court’s memorandum states: “Defendant Barnard was guilty of negligence as a matter of law unless there was sufficient excuse or justification for such conduct,” citing Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115 , 111 N. W. (2d) 345 .
  • Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
  • Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
    5 Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 261 Minn. 115 , 111 N. W. (2d) 345 .