Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Harding, 110 N.W.2d 463.

25 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
6 corrected or contradicted during the colloquy); see also, d 785, 794 (Minn. 1966) (affirming denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea where the record did not support the defendant’s claim of innocence); d 463, 468-69 (Minn. 1961) (affirming denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea where “[a] careful reading of the entire transcript indicates nothing upon which defendant might base support for his claim of innocence ”); rev. denied (Minn. July 31, 1986) (affirmin
State v. Robinson 388 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Robinson 388 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464, 473
State v. Bryant 378 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Bryant 378 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464, 473 , (trial court exercised reasonable discretion in denying motion for a change of plea where nothing in the record indicated defendant’s innocence or his failure to understand the proceedings).
State v. Knight 192 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1971
State v. Knight 192 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1971
State v. Warren, 278 Minn. 119 , State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464
State v. Wolske 160 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1968
State v. Wolske 160 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1968
State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , ; State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 .
State v. Seebold 158 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1968
State v. Seebold 158 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1968
See State v. Waldron, 273 Minn. 57 , , State v. Roggenbuck, 271 Minn. 557 , , State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , , and State v. Jones, 234 Minn. 438 , .” It is our opinion that under the record and the rules applicable here the trial court must be affirmed.
State v. Warren 153 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1967
State v. Warren 153 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1967
State v. *124 Roggenbuck, 271 Minn. 557 , 136 N. W. (2d) 857 ; State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 .
State v. Hayes 150 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1967
State v. Hayes 150 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1967
State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 .
Gran v. Dasovic 147 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1966
Gran v. Dasovic 147 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1966
As stated in the Oldendorf case ( 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. [2d] 314): “* * * It must be conceded that there was evidence upon which a jury might find that defendant’s truck was out of control and skidded into plaintiffs’ car because of uncontrollable factors rather than because of defendant’s negligence.” Under this well-established rule the court correctly submit
State v. Porter 143 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1966
State v. Porter 143 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1966
Compare State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 ; State ex rel.
State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 ; State v. Jones, 234 Minn. 438 , 48 N. W. (2d) 662 ; State v. *69 McDonnell, 165 Minn. 423 , ; State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , ; State v. Henspeter, 199 Minn. 359 , ; State v. Prickett, 217 Minn. 629 , 15 N. W. (2d) 95 .
State v. Roggenbuck 136 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1965
Distinguished State v. Roggenbuck 136 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1965
It relies on State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 , and claims that the instant case is distinguishable from State v. Jones, supra.
State v. Dehler 115 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1962
State v. Dehler 115 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1962
State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 ; State v. Jones, 234 Minn. 438 , 48 N. W. (2d) 662 .