Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc., 110 N.W.2d 348.
- Hollenkamp v. Peters 358 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Hollenkamp v. Peters
358 N.W.2d 108
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc., 260 Minn. 499, 504 , see Cramond v. AFL-CIO, 267 Minn. 229, 234 , -57 (1964).
- PARADATA OF MINN. v. Fox 356 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
PARADATA OF MINN. v. Fox
356 N.W.2d 852
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc., 260 Minn. 499, 507
- Yager v. Thompson 352 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Yager v. Thompson
352 N.W.2d 71
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The party seeking the injunction must establish that his legal remedy is inadequate, Cherne, at 92; AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc., 260 Minn. 499, 504 , and that the injunction is necessary to prevent great and irreparable harm.
- Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. Loescher 291 N.W.2d 216 Minn. 1980
-
Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. Loescher
291 N.W.2d 216
Minn. 1980
As we stated in AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc., 260 Minn. 499, 507 , “[w]hile damages from a wrongful issuance of an injunction may be determined in an injunction suit, they are recoverable (unless the writ was procured by malice) only by action on the bond.” Accord, Midland Loan Fin.
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc. 278 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1979
-
Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.
278 N.W.2d 81
Minn. 1979
AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc., 260 Minn. 499, 504
- North Central Public Service Co. v. Village of Circle Pines 224 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1974
-
North Central Public Service Co. v. Village of Circle Pines
224 N.W.2d 741
Minn. 1974
As stated in AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc. 260 Minn. 499, 504 , : “Injunctive relief should be awarded only in clear cases, reasonably free from doubt, and when necessary to prevent great and irreparable injury.
- Borom v. City of St. Paul 184 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1971
-
Borom v. City of St. Paul
184 N.W.2d 595
Minn. 1971
Williams v. Rolfe, 257 Minn. 237 , 101 N. W. (2d) 923 ; AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc. 260 Minn. 499 , 110 N. W. (2d) 348 ; Adelman v. Onischuk, 271 Minn. 216 , 135 N. W. (2d) 670 .
- Josephson v. Fremont Industries, Inc. 163 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1968
-
Josephson v. Fremont Industries, Inc.
163 N.W.2d 297
Minn. 1968
AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc. 260 Minn. 499 , 110 N. W. (2d) 348 .
- Farnes v. Freeman Lane 161 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1968
-
Farnes v. Freeman Lane
161 N.W.2d 297
Minn. 1968
8 See, AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc. 260 Minn. 499, 504 , 110 N. W. (2d) 348, 351 ; 43 C. J. S., Injunctions, § 190b.
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company 137 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1965
-
Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
137 N.W.2d 314
Minn. 1965
AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc. 260 Minn. 499 , 110 N. W. (2d) 348 .
- Adelman v. Onischuk 135 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1965
-
Adelman v. Onischuk
135 N.W.2d 670
Minn. 1965
AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc. 260 Minn. 499 , 110 N. W. (2d) 348 ; Williams v. Rolfe, 257 Minn. 237 , 101 N. W. (2d) 923 .