Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fussner v. Andert, 113 N.W.2d 355.

68 citing documents.

  • Sellnow v. Fahey 233 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1975
  • Sellnow v. Fahey 233 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1975
    Andert, 261 Minn. 347 , in which we expanded the scope of damages in a wrongful death action to include such elements as loss of advice, comfort, assistance, and protection, we defined the traditional damages test applicable to pecuniary loss as follows ( 261 Minn. 354 , ): “We have often said that
  • Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 170 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1969
  • Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 170 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1969
    For much the same reason, our decision in Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347 , , has not controlled either the decision or its expression in the instant case.
  • Range v. Van Buskirk Construction Company 161 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1968
  • Range v. Van Buskirk Construction Company 161 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1968
    As this court said in Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 354, 358 , 113 N. W. (2d) 355, 360 , 362: “* * * [Cjourts have been loath to scrutinize verdicts closely in an attempt to break them down to determine the actual money loss established.
  • Backman v. Fitch 137 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1965
  • Backman v. Fitch 137 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1965
    Lundblad v. Erickson, 180 Minn. 185 , ; Fortier v. Newman, 248 Minn. 69 , 78 N. W. (2d) 382 ; Propper v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. 237 Minn. 386 , 54 N. W. (2d) 840 ; Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 361 , 113 N. W. (2d) 355, 364 ; Koenigs v. Werner, 263 Minn. 80 , 116 N. W. (2d) 73 .
  • McCorkell v. City of Northfield 136 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1965
  • McCorkell v. City of Northfield 136 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1965
    See, Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347 , 113 N. W. (2d) 355 ; Tollefson v. Ehlers, 252 Minn. 370 , 90 N. W. (2d) 205 ; Schroht v. Voll, 245 Minn. 114 , 71 N. W. (2d) 843 .
  • Sauke v. Bird 125 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1963
  • Sauke v. Bird 125 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1963
    The jury could find that under the rules we announced in Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347 , 113 N. W. (2d) 355 , his family have suffered a substantial pecuniary loss not only in being denied his services, but in being deprived of the advice, comfort, assistance, and protection which they could expect from him in the future.
  • Herbes v. Village of Holdingford 125 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1963
  • Herbes v. Village of Holdingford 125 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1963
    In the Bundy case this court was faced with the claim that the words “means of support” in the Civil Damage Act were equivalent to the words “pecuniary loss” in the death-by-wrongful-act statute as we had construed them in Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347 , 113 N. W. (2d) 355 .
  • Bundy v. City of Fridley 122 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1963
  • Bundy v. City of Fridley 122 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1963
    They base this contention on our recent decision of Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347 , 113 N. W. (2d) 355 , which extended the measure of damages under § 573.02, subd.
  • Brabeck v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 117 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1962
  • Brabeck v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 117 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1962
    Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 359 , 113 N. W. (2d) 355, 363 .