Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Plunkett v. First National Bank of Austin, 115 N.W.2d 235.
- Maye v. University of Minnesota 615 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Maye v. University of Minnesota
615 N.W.2d 383
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(citing Plunkett v. First Nat’l Bank, 262 Minn. 231, 245-46 , ), review denied (Minn. Oct.
- Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
-
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board
550 N.W.2d 275
Minn. 1996
Plunkett v. First Nat’l Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231 , 233 n. 2, , 237 n. 2 (1962); State, ex rel.
- Pierce v. Otter Tail County 524 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Pierce v. Otter Tail County
524 N.W.2d 308
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Plunkett v. First Nat'l Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231, 245-46
- Neitzel v. County of Redwood 521 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Neitzel v. County of Redwood
521 N.W.2d 73
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Plunkett v. First National Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231, 245-46 , (absent method of review or legal remedy, judicial review of “quasi-judicial decisions of administrative bodies, if available, must be invoked by writ of certiorari”).
- In Re the Occupational License of Haymes 444 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1989
-
In Re the Occupational License of Haymes
444 N.W.2d 257
Minn. 1989
See e.g., Plunkett v. First National Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231, 246 , (“In the absence thereof any judicial review of their proceedings or decisions would be limited to review by certiorari and must meet the requirements of § 606.01.”); State ex rel.
- Bahr v. City of Litchfield 420 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1988
-
Bahr v. City of Litchfield
420 N.W.2d 604
Minn. 1988
See Plunkett v. First Nat’l Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231, 248 , -46 (1962); State ex rel.
- Bahr v. City of Litchfield 404 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Bahr v. City of Litchfield
404 N.W.2d 381
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
§ 606.01, Plunkett v. First National Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231, 248 , which provides: No writ of certiorari shall be issued, to correct any proceeding, unless such writ shall be issued within 60 days after the party applying for such writ shall have received due notice of the proceeding sought to be reviewed thereby.
- Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623 391 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1986
-
Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623
391 N.W.2d 846
Minn. 1986
§ 606.01 (1984); Plunkett v. First National Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231, 248
- White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of Hugo 388 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1986
-
White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of Hugo
388 N.W.2d 739
Minn. 1986
Plunkett v. First National Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231 , 233 n. 2, , 237 n. 2 (1962).
- Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623 380 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623
380 N.W.2d 512
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Plunkett v. First National Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231 , 233 n. 2, , 237 n. 2 (1962).
- Voettiner v. Commissioner of Education 376 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Voettiner v. Commissioner of Education
376 N.W.2d 444
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Plunkett v. First National Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231, 233 , , 237 n. 2 (1962).
- West St. Paul State Bank v. Signal Hills State Bank 223 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1974
-
West St. Paul State Bank v. Signal Hills State Bank
223 N.W.2d 793
Minn. 1974
Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231, 246 , in *129 which application was made to change the name of a trust company and also to be permitted to move from Albert Lea to Austin, we said: “* * * [D] etermination of this question appears to have been taken over by the Department of Commerce under § 45.04.
- Waters v. Putnam 183 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1971
- State v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 154 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1967
-
State v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS
154 N.W.2d 192
Minn. 1967
Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231 , 115 N. W. (2d) 235 ; The Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp. 250 Minn. 485 , 85 N. W. (2d) 207 .
- Gustafson v. RICHFIELD BANK AND TRUST COMPANY 133 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1965
-
Gustafson v. RICHFIELD BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
133 N.W.2d 843
Minn. 1965
Bank, 262 Minn. 231 , 115 N. W. (2d) 235 , was also before us on certiorari to review an order of the Department of Commerce granting an application by Plunkett and others to change the name and place of business of the Minnesota Trust Company of Albert Lea.