DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Robinson, 114 N.W.2d 737.

26 citing documents.

  • Boubelik v. Liberty State Bank 553 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Olson 478 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Olson 478 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    See State v. Robinson, 262 Minn. 79, 86-88 , -43 (1962) (collateral estoppel did not bar assault charges unless defendant could show prior acquittal of burglary was based solely on jury’s acceptance of his alibi defense), ce rt.
  • State v. McAlpine 352 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. McAlpine 352 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    The present situation is *104 similar to State v. Robinson, 262 Minn. 79 , where the claim of collateral estoppel was also raised.
  • State v. Alexander 290 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Alexander 290 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1980
    See State v. Robinson, 262 Minn. 79 , , cert.
  • State v. DeSchepper 231 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1975
  • State v. DeSchepper 231 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1975
    See, also, State v. Robinson, 262 Minn. 79 , , certiorari denied, 371 U. S. 815 , 83 S. Ct. 26 , 9 L. ed. 2d 56 (1962).
  • State v. Bellcourt 196 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Bellcourt 196 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1972
    We stated in State v. Robinson, 262 Minn. 79, 88 , , certiorari denied, 371 U. S. 815 , 83 S. Ct. 26 , 9 L. ed. 2d 56 (1962), that “[ojrdinarily, the constitutional protection of a speedy trial envelops defendant only from the time he is taken into custody and indicates to the court that he is prepared to go forward.” This is the prevailing
  • State v. Hoskins 193 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Hoskins 193 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1972
    Bauer v. Kummer, 244 Minn. 488 , Fortier v. Newman, 248 Minn. 69 , State v. Robinson, 262 Minn. 79 , , certiorari denied, 371 U. S. 815 , 83 S. Ct. 26 , 9 L. ed. 2d 56 (1962); Gardner v. Germain, 264 Minn. 61
  • McMillen v. State 182 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1970
  • McMillen v. State 182 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1970
    See, State v. Robinson, 262 Minn. 79 , 114 N. W. (2d) 737 , certiorari denied, 371 U. S. 815 , 83 S. Ct. 26 , 9 L. ed. (2d) 56.
  • State v. Borough 178 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Borough 178 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1970
    State v. Robinson, 262 Minn. 79 , 114 N. W. (2d) 737 ; State v. McTague, 173 Minn. 153 , .
  • State v. Forteson 447 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • State v. Murphy 152 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Murphy 152 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1967
    1 See, also, Comment by Maynard E. Pirsig, 40 M. S. A. 58; State v. Fredlund, 200 Minn. 44 , ; State v. Robinson, 262 Minn. 79 , 114 N. W. (2d) 737 , certiorari denied, 371 U. S. 815 , 83 S. Ct. 26 , 9 L. ed. (2d) 56; 5A Dunnell, Dig.
  • State v. Minton 149 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Minton 149 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1967
    4 Section 609.585 expressly provides: “A prosecution for or conviction of the crime of burglary is not a bar to conviction of any other crime committed on entering or while in the building entered.” See, also, State v. Hackett, 47 Minn. 425 , ; State v. Robinson, 262 Minn. 79 , 114 N. W. (2d) 737 , certiorari denied, 371 U. S. 815 , 83 S. Ct. 26 , 9 L. ed. (2d) 56; State v. Thompson, 241 Minn. 59 , 62 N. W. (2d) 512 .
  • State v. Emanuelson 128 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1964
  • State v. Emanuelson 128 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1964
    See, State v. Artz, 154 Minn. 290 , ; State v. Robinson, 262 Minn. 79 , 114 N. W. (2d) 737 , certiorari denied, 371 U. S. 815 , 83 S. Ct. 26 , 9 L. ed. (2d) 56; State v. Castle, 260 Minn. 293 , 109 N. W. (2d) 593 , certiorari denied, 368 U. S. 978 , 82 S. Ct. 481 , 7 L. ed. (2d) 439.
  • State v. Robinson 123 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1963
  • State v. Robinson 123 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1963
    Defendant contends that the rule of these cases does not apply because of *575 the disposition made of the basic problem h'ere involved in State v. Robinson, 262 Minn. 79 , 114 N. W. (2d) 737 , certiorari denied, 371 U. S. 815 , 83 S. Ct. 26 , 9 L. ed. (2d) 56.