DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Harris, 121 N.W.2d 327.

129 citing documents.

  • State v. Kotka 152 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1967
    We held in State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. Ct. 141 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 94, that the question of consent is a *340 question of fact, that the failure to object is evidence of consent, and that the burden of proving absence of consent rests upon the defendant.
  • State v. Ramsey County District Court 150 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Ramsey County District Court 150 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 1967
    See, also, State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. a. 141, 11 L. ed. (2d) 94; State v. Emerson, 266 Minn. 217 , 123 N. W. (2d) 382 .
  • State v. Grunau 141 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Grunau 141 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1966
    629.32 reads: “An arrest is made by the actual restraint of the person of the defendant or by his submission to the custody of the officer; * * Arrest was construed in State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260, 269 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327, 334 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. Ct. 141 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 94, where we stated: “* * * The arrest took place when the policemen ordered Harris from the car, i. e., when the officers interrupted him and restricted his liberty of movement.” The question then natu
  • State v. Clifford 141 N.W.2d 124 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Clifford 141 N.W.2d 124 Minn. 1966
    Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 , certiorari dismissed, 381 U. S. 907 , 85 S. Ct. 1456 , 14 L. ed. (2d) 289; State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260, 269 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327, 333 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. Ct. 141 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 94.
  • State v. Holmes 140 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Holmes 140 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1966
    State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 ; State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. Ct. 141 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 94; State ex rel.
  • State Ex Rel. Ogg v. Tahash 140 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1966
  • State Ex Rel. Ogg v. Tahash 140 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1966
    Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 ; State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 ; United States v. Ventresca, 380 U. S. 102 , 85 S. Ct. 741 , 13 L. ed. (2d) 684.
  • State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
    Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 , certiorari dismissed, 381 U. S. 907 , 85 S. Ct. 1456 , 14 L. ed. (2d) 289, and State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. Ct. 141 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 94, are cited by both parties in support of their respective contentions.
  • State v. Gebhard 137 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1965
  • State v. Gebhard 137 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1965
    In State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 , we held that a defendant who did not deny that he consented to a search and did not claim duress or coercion had the burden of proving lack of consent to a search by the police officers.
  • State v. Olson 135 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1965
  • State v. Olson 135 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1965
    *57 In State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 , involving a writ of error to review a judgment in district court where the defendant was convicted of first-degree robbery, this court stated that probable cause is to be evaluated from the viewpoint of a prudent and cautious police officer on the scene at the time of arrest; also, that the ques
  • State v. Richter 133 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1965
  • State v. Richter 133 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1965
  • State v. Richter 133 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1965
    State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260, 270 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327, 334 ; State v. Emerson, 266 Minn. 217, 220 , 123 N. W. (2d) 382, 385 ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Richter 133 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1965
    NOTES [1] State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260, 270 , ; State v. Emerson, 266 Minn. 217, 220 , ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Sorenson 134 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1965
  • State v. Sorenson 134 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1965
    State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 .
  • State v. Collins 132 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1964
  • State v. Collins 132 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1964
    For recent Minnesota cases involving evidence secured as the result of a search of an automobile, see State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 , decided April 19, 1963, and State ex rel.
  • State Ex Rel. Branchaud v. Hedman 130 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1964
  • State Ex Rel. Branchaud v. Hedman 130 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1964
    Paul v. Stovall, 225 Minn. 309 , 30 N. W. (2d) 638 ; State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 ; Zap v. United States, 328 U. S. 624 , 66 S. Ct. 1277 , 90 L. ed. 1477, reversed on other grounds, 330 U. S. 800 , 67 S. Ct. 857 , 91 L. ed. 1259; United States v. El-dridge (4 Cir.) 302 F. (2d) 463.
  • State v. Emerson 123 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1963
  • State v. Emerson 123 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1963
    See, State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 .