Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Independent School District No. 810, 109 N.W.2d 596.

25 citing documents.

In re the Matter of: Brooks J. Waldron, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
No. 810, (stating that “[w]aivers .
Lunde v. Independent School District No. 255 543 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Lunde v. Independent School District No. 255 543 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
No. 810, 260 Minn. 237, 246 , ).
In Re the Welfare of B.C.G. 537 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re the Welfare of B.C.G. 537 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
No. 810, Wabasha County, 260 Minn. 237, 246 , ).
Ruzic v. City of Eden Prairie 479 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Ruzic v. City of Eden Prairie 479 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
No. 810, 260 Minn. 237, 246 , the Minnesota Supreme Court stated: A “waiver” is a voluntary relinquishment of a known right.
Mohn v. Independent School District No. 697, Eleveth 471 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11 459 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1990
State Ex Rel. Haak v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 625 367 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1985
State Ex Rel. Haak v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 625 367 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1985
No. 810, 260 Minn. 237, 246
Bolin v. State, Department of Public Safety 313 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1981
Bolin v. State, Department of Public Safety 313 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1981
Johnson v. Independent School District No. 810, 260 Minn. 237 , for the proposition that a constitutional right may be waived, except when contrary to public policy.
Schroeder, Siegfried, Ryan & Vidas v. Modern Electronic Products, Inc. 295 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1980
Schroeder, Siegfried, Ryan & Vidas v. Modern Electronic Products, Inc. 295 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1980
Johnson v. Independent School District No. 810, 260 Minn. 237, 245
Jerviss v. Independent School District No. 294 273 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1978
Jerviss v. Independent School District No. 294 273 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1978
Johnson v. Independent School District No. 810, 260 Minn. 237, 246 , where, as here, it is not clear either that the bargaining representative knew the teachers had the right to notice and a hearing or that the representative knew that by not specifically including procedures for notice and a hearing in the plan the right to such procedures would be w
Rochester Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 535 271 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 1978
Rochester Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 535 271 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 1978
No. 810, 260 Minn. 237 , and will not be upheld where the teacher had no choice in contract terms.
Skeim v. Independent School District No. 115 234 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1975
Skeim v. Independent School District No. 115 234 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1975
No. 810, 260 Minn. 237 , State ex rel.
Perry v. Independent School District No. 696 210 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1973
Perry v. Independent School District No. 696 210 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1973
Independent School District No. 316 v. Eckert 161 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1968
Independent School District No. 316 v. Eckert 161 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1968
No. 810, 260 Minn. 237, 246 , 109 N. W. (2d) 596, 602 .