Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Village of Edina v. Joseph, 119 N.W.2d 809.

84 citing documents.

Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom 240 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1976
Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom 240 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1976
In Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 97 , we stated that “* * * an assessment can be made only to the extent of special benefits.” (Italics supplied.)
City of New Brighton v. Metropolitan Council 237 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1975
City of New Brighton v. Metropolitan Council 237 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1975
Hartle v. City of Glencoe, 303 Minn. 262 , Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84 , Qvale v. City of Willmar, 223 Minn. 51 , 13A Dunnell, Dig.
Merriam Park Community Council, Inc. v. McDonough 210 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1973
Merriam Park Community Council, Inc. v. McDonough 210 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1973
Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84
American Oil Company v. City of St. Cloud 206 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1973
American Oil Company v. City of St. Cloud 206 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1973
See Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 95 , where we said: “Respondents claim that the present residential use of property is controlling as to benefits.
Gibbish v. Village of Burnsville 200 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1972
Gibbish v. Village of Burnsville 200 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1972
Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84 , City of St.
E. H. Willmus Properties, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton 199 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1972
E. H. Willmus Properties, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton 199 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1972
Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 95 , and cases cited therein; Armour v. Village of Litchfield, 152 Minn. 382
Independent School District No. 709 v. City of Duluth 177 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1970
Independent School District No. 709 v. City of Duluth 177 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1970
In Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 95 , 119 N. W. (2d) 809, 816 , we said : “It was held in In re Assessment for Improving Superior Street, 172 Minn. 554 , , that when an assessment for a local improvement has been made by the proper municipal board or officers under due legislative authority and in the regular course of procedure such a
Wessen v. Village of Deephaven 170 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1969
Wessen v. Village of Deephaven 170 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1969
Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 93 , 119 N. W. (2d) 809, 816 .
Imperial Refineries of Minnesota, Inc. v. City of Rochester 165 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1969
Imperial Refineries of Minnesota, Inc. v. City of Rochester 165 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1969
The treatment of the Olmsted County Fairgrounds property was not arbitrary or capricious and must be considered valid and reasonable in the light of all circumstances, including the deferment of a substantial portion of the cost of the water tank and connecting trunk line improvement to be subsequently assessed against benefited properties not presently assessable.” In Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 92 , 119 N. W. (2d) 809, 815 , we held that a city council is presumed to assess only
Commissioner of Taxation v. Crow Wing County 144 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1966
Commissioner of Taxation v. Crow Wing County 144 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1966
Similarly, in Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84 , 119 N. W. (2d) 809 , we held that a class suit was not available in a proceeding under § 429.081 9 to review special assessments for local improvements.
Fichtner v. Schiller 135 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1965
Fichtner v. Schiller 135 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1965
Wall v. Borgen, supra; Rosso v. Village of *266 Brooklyn Center, 214 Minn. 364 , 8 N. W. (2d) 219 ; Land O’ Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540 , 31 N. W. (2d) 660 , certiorari denied, 334 U. S. 844 , 68 S. Ct. 1513 , 92 L. ed. 1768; Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84 , 119 N. W. (2d) 809 ; Larson v. Freeborn County, 267 Minn. 383 , 126 N. W. (2d) 771 .
Borgelt v. City of Minneapolis 135 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1965
Borgelt v. City of Minneapolis 135 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1965
Thus, the furnishing of electric current to private consumers would not be enjoined although it was alleged machinery and equipment of the city plant was thereby overtaxed at times when current was needed to light city streets.” See, also, 2 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3 ed.) § 10.33; Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84 , 119 N. W. (2d) 809 ; Griswold v. County of Ramsey, 242 Minn. 529 , 65 N. W. (2d) 647 ; Linster v. Luecke, 186 Minn. 386 , .
Adelman v. Onischuk 135 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1965
Adelman v. Onischuk 135 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1965
Two Minnesota cases that strike to the very heart of this matter are Larson v. Freeborn County, 267 Minn. 383 , *227 126 N. W. (2d) 771 , and Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84 , 119 N. W. (2d) 809 .
MINNEAPOLIS-SAINT PAUL MET. AIR. COM'N v. Stawicki 130 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1964
Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission v. Stawicki 130 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1964
MINNEAPOLIS-SAINT PAUL MET. AIR. COM'N v. Stawicki 130 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1964
607 , 608; Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 92 , .
Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission v. Stawicki 130 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1964
Paul, 173 Minn. 67, 70 , , 608; Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 92 , 119 N. W. (2d) 809, 815 .
Larson v. Freeborn County 126 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1964
Larson v. Freeborn County 126 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1964
The Rosso decision was cited and approved in Land O’Lakes and more recently in Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 100 , 119 N. W. (2d) 809, 819 , where we stated: “The authorities generally indicate that relief against erroneous or *386 illegal assessments will not be granted by a court of equity, if the property owner has an adequate remedy at law.
Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of Bloomington 125 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1964
Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of Bloomington 125 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1964
s not the province of the court to substitute its judgment for that of the body making such a decision, but merely to determine whether that body was within its jurisdiction, was not mistaken as to the applicable law, and did not act arbitrarily, oppressively, or unreasonably, and to determine whether the evidence could reasonably support or justify the determination.” Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 93 , 119 N. W. (2d) 809, 815 .