DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Peterson, 123 N.W.2d 177.

32 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Duane Edwin Koski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Duane Edwin Koski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    See, e.g., State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77, 80
  • Woodruff v. 2008 Mercedes 831 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
  • Woodruff v. 2008 Mercedes 831 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
    Appellate courts have a “responsibility to review the record even though the assignments of error are inadequate.” State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77, 83
  • State v. Ards 816 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
  • State v. Ards 816 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
    f evidence in conviction of DWI when evidence included opinion testimony of two police officers that defendant was under the influence of alcohol); State v. Hicks, 301 Minn. 350, 354 , (holding that absence of one indicator of intoxication does not render layperson’s observations insufficient to offer opinion testimony about defendant’s intoxication); State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77, 80, 82 , -81 (1963) (holding sufficient foundation exists for police officers to offer opinion testimony about de
  • Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda 789 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 2010
  • Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda 789 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 2010
    We have often stated that an appellate court has a “responsibility to review the record even though the assignments of error are inadequate.” State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77, 83 , (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
  • State v. Bernardi 678 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Bernardi 678 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    See State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77, 84 , (stating arguments as to adverse inferences may be allowed with sufficient foundation).
  • State v. Chomnarith 654 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Chomnarith 654 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 2003
    (quoting State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77, 83 , ).
  • State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    See, e.g., State v. Thompson, 300 Minn. 220, 222 , (police officer with on-the-job experience qualified as expert in fingerprint identification despite lack of formal training); State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77, 80, 82 , (experienced police officers permitted to offer opinion as to whether defendant was intoxicated); (narcotics police officer testified as to amount of cocaine that person is likely to possess for personal use); State v. Schaffer
  • State v. Williams 525 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Williams 525 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1994
    As Justice Rogosheske said over 30 years ago in State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77, 83 , an appellate court has a “responsibility to review the record even though the assignments of error are inadequate * * , 673 n. 7 (Minn
  • State v. Post 512 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Post 512 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1994
    As Justice Rogosheske said in State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77, 83 , an appellate court has a “responsibility to review the record even though assignments of error are inadequate.” See also Allan D. Vestal, Sua Sponte Consideration in Appellate Review, 27 Fordham L.Rev.
  • Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
  • Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
    See, State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77 , State v. Simonsen, 252 Minn. 315 , Clarke v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. 92; Minn. 418
  • State v. Freeman 227 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Freeman 227 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1975
    See, State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77, 83
  • State v. Hicks 222 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1974
  • State v. Hicks 222 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1974
    2 These cases include State v. Dax, 290 Minn. 546 , Trail v. Village of Elk River, 286 Minn. 380 , State v. Duren, 266 Minn. 335 , State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77 , State v. Simonsen, 252 Minn. 315 , State v. Graham, 176 Minn. 164 , Clarke v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. 92 Minn. 418 , McKillop v. Duluth St.
  • State v. Staat 192 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Staat 192 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1971
    State v. Fontana, 277 Minn. 286 , State v. Boerner, 267 Minn. 539 , State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77 , State v. Rediker, 214 Minn. 470
  • Trail v. Village of Elk River 175 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1970
  • Trail v. Village of Elk River 175 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1970
    State v. Simonsen, 252 Minn. 315, 328 , 89 N. W. (2d) 910, 918 ; State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77 , 123 N. W. (2d) 177 ; Clarke v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. 92 Minn. 418 , .
  • State v. Youngmark 172 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Youngmark 172 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1969
    See, State v. Bell, 262 Minn. 545 , 115 N. W. (2d) 468 ; State v. Collins, 276 Minn. 459 , 150 N. W. (2d) 850 , certiorari denied, 390 U. S. 960 , 88 S. Ct. 1058 , 19 L. ed. (2d) 1156; State v. Nor-gaard, 272 Minn. 48 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628 ; State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77 , 123 N. W. (2d) 177 ; State v. Shetsky, 229 Minn. 566 , 40 N. W. (2d) 337 .
  • State v. Walker 157 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Walker 157 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1968
    State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77 , 123 N. W. (2d) 177 .