Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 124 N.W.2d 328.

88 citing documents.

Beutz v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. 431 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 1988
Beutz v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. 431 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 1988
This court set out the rule which bars litigation of a claim under the doctrine of res judicata in The Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 466 , as follows: “A judgment on the merits constitutes an absolute bar to a second suit for the same cause of action, and is conclusive between parties and privites, not only as to every matter which was actually litigated, but also as to every matter which might have been litigated, ther
Riverbluff Development Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America 412 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Riverbluff Development Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America 412 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See also Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 466 , (quoting Veline v. Dahlquist, 64 Minn. 119, 121 , 66 N.W.
Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. Swanson 403 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. Swanson 403 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 466 , quoting Veline v. Dahlquist, 64 Minn. 119, 121 , 66 N.W.
Overseas Commodities Corp., Inc. v. Dockman 389 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Overseas Commodities Corp., Inc. v. Dockman 389 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450 , Settem v. Etter, 236 Minn. 514
Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623 380 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623 380 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 482
Liedtke v. Fillenworth 372 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Liedtke v. Fillenworth 372 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Dollar Travel Agency, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., (quoting Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 466 , ), pet.
ACTON CONST. CO., INC. v. State 363 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
ACTON CONST. CO., INC. v. State 363 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450
In Re Minneapolis Community Development Agency Ex Rel. Certificate of Title No. 471580 359 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re Minneapolis Community Development Agency Ex Rel. Certificate of Title No. 471580 359 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Scott-Peabody & Associates v. Northern Leasing Corp., 273 Minn. 236 , Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 466
Mattsen v. Packman 358 N.W.2d 48 Minn. 1984
Mattsen v. Packman 358 N.W.2d 48 Minn. 1984
quoting The Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 466 , Velina v. Dahlquist, 64 Minn. 119, 121 , 66 N.W.
Dollar Travel Agency, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 354 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Dollar Travel Agency, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 354 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 466
Bifulk v. Evans 353 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bifulk v. Evans 353 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In The Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 466 , we stated: “ ‘A judgment on the merits constitutes an absolute bar to a second suit for the same cause of action, and is conclusive between parties and privies, not only as to every matter which was actually litigated, but also as to every matter which might have been litigated there
Nelson v. Engen 347 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Nelson v. Engen 347 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 466
Worthington Tractor Salvage, Inc. v. Miller 346 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re Complaint Concerning Judge McDonough 296 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1980
Hauser v. Mealey 263 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1978
Hauser v. Mealey 263 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1978
In The Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 466 , we stated: “ ‘A judgment on the merits constitutes an absolute bar to a second suit for the same cause of action, and is conclusive between parties and privies, not only as to every matter which was actually litigated, but also as to every matter which might have been litigated there
Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of Itasca 258 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1977
Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of Itasca 258 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1977
See, Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 473
Susla v. State 247 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1976
Susla v. State 247 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1976
“* * * [W]hile acting in its sovereign character the state is immune, but when it descends to the level of those with whom it associates and interests itself in any property and proprietary rights as distinguished from governmental prerogatives, it subjects itself to the same liability as any other litigant.” The Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 473
STATE, ETC. v. McGuire Architects-Planners 245 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 1976
STATE, ETC. v. McGuire Architects-Planners 245 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 1976
See, also, The Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450
Aiple v. Twin City Barge & Towing Co. 154 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1967
Aiple v. Twin City Barge & Towing Co. 154 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1967
1B Moore, Federal Practice (2 ed.) pp. 621 to 624, 631, 632; Veline v. Dahlquist, 64 Minn. 119 , ; The Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450 , 124 N. W. (2d) 328 .
Scott-Peabody & Associates v. Northern Leasing Corp. 140 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1966
Scott-Peabody & Associates v. Northern Leasing Corp. 140 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1966
The Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450 , 124 N. W. (2d) 328 ; Veline v. Dahlquist, 64 Minn. 119 , .