Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Oman, 121 N.W.2d 616.

28 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Ricky Harry Gruber 864 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Harry Gruber 864 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Oman, 265 Minn. 277, 282– 83, –21 (1963); see, e.g., State v. LaValla, 278 Minn. 63, 66, (requiring additional facts for a burglary charge because burglary can be committed in various ways).
State v. Kendell 723 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 2006
State v. Kendell 723 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 2006
State v. Oman, 265 Minn. 277, 281 , -20 (1963).
Ruberg v. State 428 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Ruberg v. State 428 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In discussing a complaint alleging sexual abuse of a child, the Minnesota Supreme Court has stated: “The complaint must state the essential facts constituting the offense charged.” (citing State V. Oman, 265 Minn. 277, 282 , ).
State v. Bias 419 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1988
State v. Bias 419 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1988
State v. Oman, 265 Minn. 277, 281 , citing Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749, 763 , 82 S.Ct.
State v. Wickstrom 405 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Wickstrom 405 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See State v. Oman, 265 Minn. 277 , (in testing an indictment, the court looks to the elements of the offense rather than the exact statutory language).
State v. Serstock 402 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1987
State v. Serstock 402 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1987
In State v. Oman, 265 Minn. 277 , this court, quoting Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749, 763-64 , 82 S.Ct.
State v. Serstock 390 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Serstock 390 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See State v. Oman, 265 Minn. 277, 281
State v. Jannetta 355 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Jannetta 355 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Oman, 265 Minn. 277, 281 , -20 (1963).
State v. Becker 351 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1984
State v. Becker 351 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1984
State v. Oman, 265 Minn. 277, 282
State v. LaValla 153 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1967
State v. LaValla 153 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1967
We pointed out in State v. Oman, *67 265 Minn. 277 , 121 N. W. (2d) 616 , that if the statute does not set forth all of the elements necessary to constitute the offense intended to be punished, an indictment which simply follows the words of the statute is not sufficient, and in such case the indictment must allege with certainty all of the particular facts necessary
State v. Pratt 152 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 1967
State v. Pratt 152 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 1967
5 This conclusion distinguishes this situation from that in State v. Oman, 265 Minn. 277 , 121 N. W. (2d) 616 .
State v. Lehn 134 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1965
State v. Lehn 134 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1965
State v. Mancino, 257 Minn. 580 , 102 N. W. (2d) 504 ; State v. Oman, 265 Minn. 277 , 121 N. W. (2d) 616 .
State v. Owens 129 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1964
State v. Owens 129 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1964
State v. Mancino, 257 Minn. 580 , 102 N. W. (2d) 504 ; State v. Oman, 265 Minn. 277 , 121 N. W. (2d) 616 .
State v. Kopetka 121 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1963
State v. Kopetka 121 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1963
See, also, State v. Oman, 265 Minn. 277 , 121 N. W. (2d) 616 .