DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Sorenson, 134 N.W.2d 115.

85 citing documents.

  • State Ex Rel. Trimble v. Hedman 192 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1971
    Probable cause is concerned with probabilities and is something more than mere suspicion and something less than evidence which would sustain a conviction.” See, also, State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186, 198 , where we said: “Since the police deal with probabilities, not legal proof, in deciding whether to arrest without a warrant, this means, according to Jackson v. United States, 112 App. D. C. 260, 263, 302 F. (2d) 194, 197: “ * * The police are entitled to rely upon hearsay which wou
  • Sipera v. State 175 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 1970
  • Sipera v. State 175 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 1970
    State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 ; State v. Bean, 280 Minn. *538 35, 157 N. W. (2d) 736 , certiorari denied, 393 U. S. 1003 , 89 S. Ct. 493 , 21 L. ed. (2d) 468.
  • State v. Nelson 173 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Nelson 173 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1969
    State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 .
  • State v. Mastrian 171 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Mastrian 171 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1969
    State v. Harrison, 279 Minn. 310 , 156 N. W. (2d) 763 ; State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133 , 153 N. W. (2d) 254 ; State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 .
  • State v. Valstad 165 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Valstad 165 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1969
    Ogg v. Tahash, 273 Minn. 187 , 140 N. W. (2d) 692 ; State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 ; State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. Ct. 141 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 94.
  • State v. Russell 164 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Russell 164 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1969
    See, also, State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 .
  • State v. Stewig 161 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Stewig 161 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1968
    1 The controlling considerations for establishing probable cause to arrest are those discussed at length in State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186, 196 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 , 122: “Probable cause for ah arrest has been defined to be a ‘reasonable ground of suspicion supported by circumstances sufficiently strong in themselves to warrant a cautious man in believing the accused to be guilty.’ [Citations omitted.]
  • State v. Thieme 160 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Thieme 160 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1968
    See, State v. Demry, 260 Minn. 173 , 109 N. W. (2d) 587 ; State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 ; State v. Grunau, 273 Minn. 315 , 141 N. W. (2d) 815 ; Warden v. Hayden, 387 U. S. 294 , 87 S. Ct. 1642 , 18 L. ed. (2d) 782.
  • State v. Fish 159 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Fish 159 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1968
    Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 , certiorari dismissed, 381 U. S. 907 , 85 S. Ct. 1456 , 14 L. ed. (2d) 289; State v. Clifford, 273 Minn. 249 , 141 N. W. (2d) 124 ; State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 .
  • State v. Bean 157 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Bean 157 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1968
    State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 .
  • State v. Harrison 156 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Harrison 156 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1968
    (4) Upon a charge made upon reasonable cause of the commission of a felony by the person arrested.” This court has said: *316 “The constitutional mandate requiring ‘probable cause’ and the statutory standard of ‘reasonable cause’ are synonymous.” State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260, 263 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327, 330 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. Ct. 141 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 94; State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 ; State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133 , 153 N. W. (2d) 254 .
  • State v. Purdy 153 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Purdy 153 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1967
    State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 .
  • State v. Garrity 151 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Garrity 151 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1967
    He contends that such mere suspicion was not enough for an arrest, citing Garske v. United States (8 Cir.) 1 F. (2d) 620; State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 ; Henry v. United States, 361 U. S. 98 , 80 S. Ct. 168 , 4 L. ed. (2d) 134; Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U. S. 471 , 83 S. Ct. 407 , 9 L. ed. (2d) 441; Gatlin v. United States, 117 App. D. C. 123, 326 F. (2d) 666; United States v. Meachum (D. D. C.) 197 F. Supp. 803 .
  • State v. Billstrom 149 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Billstrom 149 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1967
    In State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186, 202 , 134 N.W.
  • State v. Grunau 141 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Grunau 141 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1966
    Defendant relies on Preston v. United States, 376 U. S. 364 , 84 S. Ct. 881 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 777, and State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 .
  • State v. Clifford 141 N.W.2d 124 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Clifford 141 N.W.2d 124 Minn. 1966
    4 State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186, 199 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115, 124 ; Preston v. United States, 376 U. S. 364, 366 , 84 S. Ct. 881, 883 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 777, 780.
  • State v. Holmes 140 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Holmes 140 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1966
    State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 ; State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. Ct. 141 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 94; State ex rel.
  • State v. Spreigl 139 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 1965
  • State v. Spreigl 139 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 1965
    1 State v. Hines, 270 Minn. 30, 39 , 133 N. W. (2d) 371, 377 ; State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186, 201 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115, 125 ; State v. Elli, 267 Minn. 185, 188 , 125 N. W. (2d) 738, 740 .