Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jones, 127 N.W.2d 153.

59 citing documents.

State v. Ingram 141 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1966
Grattan v. Tahash, 262 Minn. 18 , 113 N. W. (2d) 342 ; State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 ; State ex rel.
State ex rel. Vicklund v. Tahash 140 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1966
State ex rel. Vicklund v. Tahash 140 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1966
In State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421, 427 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153, 157 , we said, “No plea should be accepted where it appears doubtful that it is not made intelligently and understanding^.” If we should grant the maximum relief to which petitioner would be entitled, the result would be that he would be returned to custody for a new trial.
State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
Grattan v. Tahash, 262 Minn. 18 , 113 N. W. (2d) 342 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 ; and State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 , where statements made by the respective defendants imposed upon the trial court the duty to enter a plea of not guilty in behalf of the defendant.
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Tahash 136 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1965
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Tahash 136 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1965
1 See, State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 .
State v. Anderson 134 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1965
Distinguished State v. Anderson 134 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1965
Accordingly, the case is distinguishable from State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 , and State ex rel.