Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc., 128 N.W.2d 334.

59 citing documents.

J. Paul Robinson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
6 Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 194
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transp., Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 194 , Koeper v. Town of Louisville, 109 Minn. 519, 522 , 124 N.W.
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
Second, we disagree with the court of appeals’ conclusion that UPB’s claim is similar “to a request for specific performance of a contract, for which a jury trial is not required.” UPB, d at 271 (citing Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transp., Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 193 , ).
Storms v. Schneider 802 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Storms v. Schneider 802 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
See Rognrud v. Zubert, 282 Minn. 430, 434, -48 (1969); Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transp., Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 192-94, -47 (1964).
Rios v. Jennie-O Turkey Store, Inc. 793 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Rios v. Jennie-O Turkey Store, Inc. 793 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Inc., 268 Minn. 176 , see also 11 Samuel Williston et al., A Treatise on the Law of Contracts § 30:19, at 203-04 (4th ed.1999).
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 782 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 782 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
See Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transp., Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 193 , (explaining that a demand for payment of monetary penalties allowed by contract is a request for specific performance, and although specific performance is an equitable remedy, “award of [monetary] damages was within the power of the court of equity”).
Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co. 732 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 2007
Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co. 732 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 2007
Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 183-84 , -41 (1964), but that case focuses on the interpretation of the term "final order” in a contract and in a specific statute that governed appeals from the Railroad and Warehouse Commission.
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
Accordingly, in Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transportation, Inc., 268 Minn. 176 , we held that in an action for specific performance of an agreement, in which the plaintiff sought monetary damages as part of the equitable relief, rather than as an award of damages for breach of contract, there was no constitutional right to jury trial.
Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2001
Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2001
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transp., Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 192
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Spartz 588 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Spartz 588 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transpon, Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 183
Marzitelli v. City of Little Canada 582 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1998
Marzitelli v. City of Little Canada 582 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1998
See generally Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transp., Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 183
City of Rochester v. People's Cooperative Power Ass'n 567 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
City of Rochester v. People's Cooperative Power Ass'n 567 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Trans., Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 183 , (judgment becomes final after appellate process is terminated or time for appeal has expired).
Application of Minnegasco 556 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Application of Minnegasco 556 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
lows: We think the only feasible rule is that, when an order of the commission is set aside and vacated by the court upon an appeal under § 216.25, the matter stands before the commission exactly as if no order had been made Rock Island Motor Transit Co. v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, 239 Minn. 284, 293 , see also Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 185 , -42 (1964) (stating that when order is vacated and set aside on appeal, the preceding order is left “witho
Johnson v. Gray 533 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Johnson v. Gray 533 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 183
Nimis v. St. Paul Turners 521 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Nimis v. St. Paul Turners 521 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
North Star Ctr, Inc. v. Sibley Bowl, Inc., 295 Minn. 424, 426 , Indianhead Truck Line v. Hvidsten Transp., Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 183
Blaine Economic Development Authority v. Royal Electric Co. 520 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Blaine Economic Development Authority v. Royal Electric Co. 520 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 187 , (alteration in original) (quoting McWithy v. Heart River Sch.
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 192
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc. 460 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc. 460 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 184 , William Lindeke Land Co. v. Kalman, 190 Minn. 601, 607 , 252 N.W.
Career Resources, Inc. v. Pearson Candy Co. 435 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Career Resources, Inc. v. Pearson Candy Co. 435 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 184 , (“parties to a contract are presumed to enter into their engagements with reference to the applicable law”); William Lindeke Land Co. v. Kalman, 190 Minn. 601, 607 , 252 N.W.
BAKER DOMES, DIV. OF RM BAKER CO. v. Wolfe 403 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
BAKER DOMES, DIV. OF RM BAKER CO. v. Wolfe 403 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Indianhead Truck Line Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 186 , 17 Am.Jur.2d Contracts § 333 (1964).
Park-Lake Car Wash, Inc. v. Springer 394 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Park-Lake Car Wash, Inc. v. Springer 394 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 193 , (quoting Annot., 7 A.L.R.2d 1204 , 1206 (1949)).
Sonenstahl v. L.E.L.S., Inc. 372 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sonenstahl v. L.E.L.S., Inc. 372 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc., v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 194 , quoted the Koeper decision with approval and denied a jury trial where a plaintiff brought a suit for specific performance of an agreement and also sought money damages for the failure to perform under that agreement.
Rick v. B.D.M.S., Inc. 347 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Rick v. B.D.M.S., Inc. 347 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transp., Inc., 268 Minn. 176
Olson v. Aretz 346 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Olson v. Aretz 346 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 196
In Re Commodore Hotel Fire & Explosion Cases 324 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1982
In Re Commodore Hotel Fire & Explosion Cases 324 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1982
In Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc., 268 Minn. 176, 195-96 , we approved recovery of damages which included, among other elements, clerical and office expense, interest on an escrow deposit, and attorneys fees incurred by plaintiff as a result of the defendant’s refusal to perform a contract.
Fred O. Watson Co. v. United States Life Insurance Co. of New York 258 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1977