Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Beilke, 127 N.W.2d 516.

32 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(quoting Commonwealth v. Bouvier , 55 N.E.2d 913, 916 (Mass. 1944) ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
It is intentional conduct which the actor ma y not intend to be harmful but which an ordinary and reasonably prudent man would recognize as involving a strong probability of injury to others.” State v. Zupetz
State v. Back 775 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 2009
State v. Back 775 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 2009
“Culpable negligence” is “more than ordinary negligence” and “more than gross negligence.” State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526, 534
State v. Chambers 589 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1999
State v. Chambers 589 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1999
Culpable negligence has been defined as “intentional conduct which the actor may not intend to be harmful but which an ordinary and reasonably prudent man would recognize as involving a strong probability of injury to others.” State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526, 534
State v. Moore 458 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1990
State v. Moore 458 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1990
This court has described the culpable negligence in the definition of second degree manslaughter as “recklessness,” “intentional conduct which the actor may not intend to be harmful but which an ordinary and reasonably prudent man would recognize as involving a strong probability of injury to others.” (quoting State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526, 534 , ).
State v. Bicek 429 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Bicek 429 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526, 534
State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526, 534
State v. Jones 402 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Jones 402 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The facts supported by the proffered circumstantial evidence must “form a complete chain which * * * leads so directly to the guilt of the accused as to exclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, any reasonable inference other than that of guilt.” State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526, 531 , (citation omitted).
State v. Mitjans 394 N.W.2d 221 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Mitjans 394 N.W.2d 221 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
It is intentional conduct which the actor may not intend to be harmful but which an ordinary and reasonably prudent man would recognize as involving a strong probability of injury to others.” State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526, 527
State v. Frost 342 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1983
State v. Frost 342 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1983
The state's interpretation of the elements of the offense is based on State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526
State v. Zupetz 322 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1982
State v. Zupetz 322 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1982
This instruction is based on language in State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526, 534
In Re the Welfare of S. W. T. 277 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1979
In Re the Welfare of S. W. T. 277 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1979
It is intentional conduct which the actor may not intend to be harmful but which an ordinary and reasonably prudent man would recognize as involving a strong possibility of injuries to others.” State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526, 534
State v. Swanson 240 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1976
State v. Swanson 240 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1976
State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526, 534
State v. Loss 204 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1973
State v. Loss 204 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1973
er, 230 Minn. 39, 52 , which held that circumstantial evidence will support a conviction only where the facts described by it— “* * * form a complete chain which, in the light of the evidence as a whole, leads so directly to the guilt of the accused as to exclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, any reasonable inference other than that of guilt * * Accord: State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526 , State v. Lundstrom, 285 Minn. 130
State v. Spann 182 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1970
State v. Spann 182 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1970
2 In State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526, 534 , 127 N. W. (2d) 516, 521 , this court stated: “In State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480 , this court thoroughly discussed the meaning of culpable negligence.
State v. Lundstrom 171 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1969
State v. Lundstrom 171 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1969
evidence will support a conviction only where the facts disclosed by it— “* * * form a complete chain which, in the light of the evidence as a whole, leads so directly to the guilt of the accused as to exclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, any reasonable inference other than that of guilt * * State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313, 322 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137, 1150; State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526, 531 , 127 N. W. (2d) 516, 520 .
State v. Johnson 152 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1967
State v. Johnson 152 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1967
In State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526 , 127 N. W. (2d) 516 , we reversed a conviction of manslaughter in the second degree where we felt that the evidence failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty of “culpable negligence.” We pointed out that while the conduct there might properly have been found to be negligent, it could not