Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co., 130 N.W.2d 534.

32 citing documents.

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Anders L. Odegaard, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0399628. ... Minn. 2025
(disbarring an attorney convicted of murder in the second degree); – 83 (Minn. 1966) (disbarring an attorney convicted of murder in the third degree); (disbarring an attorney convicted of murder in the first degree
Graves v. Wayman 816 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Graves v. Wayman 816 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Peavey & Co., 269 Minn. 221, 229 , (“Because of their ignorance and inexperience in regard to matters concerning which material representations were made, plaintiffs had a right to rely upon the superior knowledge of defendants.”).
Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 616 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 2000
Haberle v. Buchwald 480 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Haberle v. Buchwald 480 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Peavey & Co., 269 Minn. 221, 230
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. City of St. Peter 433 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. City of St. Peter 433 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Peavey & Co., 269 Minn. 221, 228-29 , (representations went beyond mere “puffing” because the parties were not “on an equality”; defendants had “superior knowledge” and plaintiffs were “ignoran[t] and inexperience[d] in regard to matters concerning which material representations were made”).
Nave v. Dovolos 395 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nave v. Dovolos 395 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Peavy & Co., 269 Minn. 221, 228 , -40 (1964).
Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1986
Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1986
Peavey & Co., 269 Minn. 221
Florenzano v. Olson 387 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1986
Stanger v. Gordon 244 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1976
Stanger v. Gordon 244 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1976
In Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey Co. 269 Minn. 221, 230 , we stated, however, that “where fraud and deception are in issue, the evidence must necessarily take a wide range, and collateral facts are admissible if they have a logical tendency to throw light on the issue.” While the collateral evidence admitted here may have approached the o
Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc. 235 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1975
Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc. 235 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1975
Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co. 269 Minn. 221
In Re Application for Discipline of Thompson 209 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1973
Ex Parte Wall, 107 U. S. 265 , 2 S. Ct. 569 , 27 L. ed. 552 (1883); In re Discipline of Johnson, 274 Minn. 560 , In re Discipline of Ryan, 269 Minn. 577
FRANKLIN THEATRE CORPORATION v. City of Minneapolis 198 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1972
FRANKLIN THEATRE CORPORATION v. City of Minneapolis 198 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1972
Corp. 276 Minn. 116 , Sawyer v. Tildahl, 275 Minn. 457, 460 , d *522 131, 133 (1967); Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co. 269 Minn. 221, 228
Christy v. Saliterman 179 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1970
Christy v. Saliterman 179 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1970
Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co. 269 Minn. 221 , 130 N. W. (2d) 534 ; 5 Am.
Consolidated Foods Corporation v. Pearson 178 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 1970
Consolidated Foods Corporation v. Pearson 178 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 1970
Corp. 276 Minn. 116 , 149 N. W. (2d) 37 ; Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co. 269 Minn. 221 , 130 N. W. (2d) 534 ; Spiess v. Brandt, 230 Minn. 246 , 41 N. W. (2d) 561 ; Prosser, Torts (3 ed.) § 103.
Berryman v. Riegert 175 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1970
Berryman v. Riegert 175 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1970
See, Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co. 269 Minn. 221 , 130 N. W. (2d) 535 ; Swanson v. Domning, supra.
Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing Corporation 149 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1967
Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing Corporation 149 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1967
(3 ed.) §§ 3818, 3821; Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co. 269 Minn. 221 , 130 N. W. (2d) 534 ; Hafner v. Ritzinger, 256 Minn. 196 , 97 N. W. (2d) 839 ; Swanson v. Domning, 251 Minn. 110 , 86 N. W. (2d) 716 ; Spiess v. Brandt, supra; 37 C. J. S., Fraud, § 27.
Kennedy v. Flo-Tronics, Inc. 143 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 1966
Kennedy v. Flo-Tronics, Inc. 143 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 1966
6 A recent decision of this court on which plaintiff relies is Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co. 269 Minn. 221 , 130 N. W. (2d) 534 .
Swedeen v. Swedeen 134 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1965
Swedeen v. Swedeen 134 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1965
The right of recovery * * * is based on the fact that such statement, being untrue in fact, relied upon by the other party in entering into the transaction, has resulted in the loss to him which he should not be required to bear.” See, Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co. 269 Minn. 221 , 130 N. W. (2d) 534 .