Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co., 128 N.W.2d 151.

25 citing documents.

Travelers Insurance Company v. Thompson 163 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 2008
Travelers Insurance Company v. Thompson 163 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 2008
Co. 268 Minn. 122 , 128 N. W. (2d) 151 ; Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co. 257 Minn. 487 , 102 N. W. (2d) 293 ; Lustik v. Rankila, 269 Minn. 515 , 131 N. W. (2d) 741 .
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Spartz 588 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Spartz 588 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., 268 Minn. 122, 125-26 , -54 (Minn.1964) (citation omitted).
State v. Turner 550 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1996
State v. Turner 550 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1996
Parker v. MVBA Harvestore Systems 491 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Parker v. MVBA Harvestore Systems 491 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co., 268 Minn. 122, 125 , (quoting Wolfson v. Northern States Mgmt.
Roseberg v. Steen 363 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Roseberg v. Steen 363 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See, e.g., Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co., 268 Minn. 122, 125
Virsen v. Rosso, Beutel, Johnson, Rosso & Ebersold 356 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Virsen v. Rosso, Beutel, Johnson, Rosso & Ebersold 356 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co., 268 Minn. 122, 125 , Wolfson v. Northern States Management Co., 221 Minn. 474, 479
State v. Hatcher 322 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 1982
Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 319 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1982
Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 319 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1982
While, as a general rule, a verdict does not operate as an estoppel until it becomes a judgment, see, e.g., Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co., 268 Minn. 122 , Smith v. Smith, 235 Minn. 412 , exceptions to that general rule have been recognized “where the parties have acquiesced in the verdict” and “where, through the lapse of time or other cause, a motion for a new trial or arrest of judgment cannot be granted.” Miller v. Simon
In Re Village of Byron 255 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1977
In Re Village of Byron 255 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1977
Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co. 268 Minn. 122 , Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co., 257 Minn. 487, 491
Shimp Ex Rel. Shimp v. Sederstrom 233 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1975
Shimp Ex Rel. Shimp v. Sederstrom 233 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1975
Sachs v. Jenista 210 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1973
Sachs v. Jenista 210 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1973
Co. 268 Minn. 122 , 10B Dunnell, Dig.
Aiple v. Twin City Barge & Towing Co. 154 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1967
Aiple v. Twin City Barge & Towing Co. 154 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1967
Co. 268 Minn. 122, 125 , 128 N. W. (2d) 151 , 153: “Under the doctrine of res judicata, it is well recognized that parties to an action may be estopped from relitigating issues in a subsequent action that were raised and determined in a prior action.
State ex rel. Graham v. District Court 150 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1967
State ex rel. Graham v. District Court 150 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1967
Co. 268 Minn. 122 , 128 N. W. (2d) 151 .