DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Baker, 160 N.W.2d 240.

23 citing documents.

  • Minn. 2023
    1(3), we approved of a self-defense jury instruction that asked the jury to consider whether the force used by the defendant was necessary to resist the threat of bodily harm—and more specifically, an “assault.” –43 (Minn. 1968) (emphasis added).
  • In the Matter of the Welfare of: D. K. B.-W., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    (victim punched defendant); (victim kicked defendant in the head); (victim police officer pushed defendant’s friend); –36 (Minn. 1978) (victim fired shots); (victim hit defendant with umbrella); (victim punched and kicked defendant); (victim grabbed and kicked defendant); (victim tried to hit and strangle defendant); Soukup, d at 427 (victim in fistfight with defendant)
  • State v. Soukup 656 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Soukup 656 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    See State v. Baker, 280 Minn. 518, 523
  • State v. Nystrom 596 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Nystrom 596 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1999
    See, -03 (Minn.1980); State v. Graham, 292 Minn. 308, 310-12 , -45 (1972); State v. Baker, 280 Minn. 518, 521-24 , -43 (1968); State v. Shippey, 10 Minn. 223 (1865).
  • Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
  • Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
    The state has a right to vigorously argue its theory of the ease, State v. Baker, 280 Minn. 518, 527-28 , -46 (1968), but the state may not so clearly imply that the defendant’s plea is a ruse.
  • State v. Grayson 546 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Grayson 546 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1996
    See State v. Baker, 280 Minn. 518, 527 , (the court noting that “[tjhere can be little doubt that a remark appealing to racial prejudice might tend to inflame the minds of the jurors”).
  • State v. Rein 477 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Rein 477 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    See State v. Baker, 280 Minn. 518, 521-22 , (force justified if reasonably necessary); 10 Minnesota Practice, CRIM.
  • State v. Gray 456 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Gray 456 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1990
    State v. Baker, 280 Minn. 518, 522
  • State v. Dick 419 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Dick 419 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    State v. Baker, 280 Minn. 518, 522
  • State v. McKissic 415 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. McKissic 415 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Baker, 280 Minn. 518, 522-23 , -43 (1968).
  • State v. Columbus 258 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Columbus 258 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1977
    Homicide, § 395, p. 229.” See, also, State v. Baker, 280 Minn. 518
  • State v. Dakota 217 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1974
  • State v. Dakota 217 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1974
    The rule stated in the instruction in question was explicitly approved in State v. Johnson, 277 Minn. 368 , a homicide case, and again approved in State v. Baker, 280 Minn. 518 , a case involving assault.