DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Norgaard, 136 N.W.2d 628.

144 citing documents.

  • State v. Leinweber 228 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Leinweber 228 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1975
    State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48 , State v. West, 285 Minn. 188 , State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
  • State v. Williams 210 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Williams 210 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1973
    State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48
  • State v. Weigold 198 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Weigold 198 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1972
    State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48, 52 , State v. Markuson, 261 Minn. 515, 517
  • State v. Mims 196 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Mims 196 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1972
    State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48, 52 , State v. Markuson, 261 Minn. 515, 517
  • State v. Otten 195 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Otten 195 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1972
    State v. Harrison, 279 Minn. 310 , State v. Markuson, 261 Minn. 515 , State v. Kline, 266 Minn. 372 , certiorari denied, 376 U. S. 962 , 84 S. Ct. 1124 , 11 L. ed. 2d 980 (1964); State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48 , Cady v. United States, 54 App. D. C. 10, 293 F. 829 (1923).
  • State v. Combs 195 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Combs 195 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1972
    That rule is best stated in State v. Thompson, 273 Minn. 1, 36 , , certiorari denied, 385 U. S. 817 , 87 S. Ct. 39 , 17 L. ed. 2d 56 (1966): “* * * In State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48, 52 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628, 631 , we said: “ ‘In passing upon the weight and sufficiency of the evidence we can only repeat that the scope of our review is limited to ascertaining whether under the evidence contained in the record the jury could reasonably find the accused guilty of the offense charged.
  • State v. Whelan 189 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Whelan 189 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1971
    State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48, 52 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628, 632 .
  • State v. Fulford 187 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Fulford 187 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1971
    If the jury, acting with due regard for the presumption of innocence and for the necessity of overcoming it by proof beyond a reasonable doubt, could reasonably conclude that defendant was proven guilty of the offense charged, a reviewing court will not disturb its verdict.” State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48, 52 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628, 631 .
  • State v. Reichenberger 182 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Reichenberger 182 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1970
    State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628 .
  • State v. Bond 173 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Bond 173 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1969
    State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628 .
  • State v. West 173 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1969
  • State v. West 173 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1969
    See, State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628 .
  • State v. Youngmark 172 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Youngmark 172 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1969
    See, State v. Bell, 262 Minn. 545 , 115 N. W. (2d) 468 ; State v. Collins, 276 Minn. 459 , 150 N. W. (2d) 850 , certiorari denied, 390 U. S. 960 , 88 S. Ct. 1058 , 19 L. ed. (2d) 1156; State v. Nor-gaard, 272 Minn. 48 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628 ; State v. Peterson, 266 Minn. 77 , 123 N. W. (2d) 177 ; State v. Shetsky, 229 Minn. 566 , 40 N. W. (2d) 337 .
  • State v. Kortness 170 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Kortness 170 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 1969
    State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628 ; State v. Collins, 276 Minn. 459 , 150 N. W. (2d) 850 , certiorari denied, 390 U. S. 960 , 88 S. Ct. 1058 , 19 L. ed. (2d) 1156.
  • State v. Hansen 169 N.W.2d 48 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Hansen 169 N.W.2d 48 Minn. 1969
    If the jury, acting with due regard for the presumption of innocence and for the necessity of overcoming it by proof beyond a reasonable doubt, could reasonably conclude that defendant was proven guilty of the offense charged, a reviewing court will not disturb its verdict.” State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48, 52 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628, 631 .
  • State v. Tribblet 162 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Tribblet 162 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1968
    If it appears from the examination that the witness understands the obligation of an oath and is capable of correctly narrating the facts to which his testimony relates, the witness is competent in fact and should be permitted to testify.” Specific application of the rule to witnesses of tender years is to be found in State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628 .
  • State v. O'DONNELL 158 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1968
  • State v. O'DONNELL 158 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1968
    See, also, State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628 .
  • State v. Carlson 158 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Carlson 158 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1968
    Our responsibility extends no further than to make a painstaking review of the record to determine whether the evidence, direct and circumstantial, viewed most favorably to support a finding of guilt, was sufficient to permit the jury to reach that conclusion.” See, also, Cady v. United States, 54 App. D. C. 10, 293 F. 829 ; State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628 .
  • State v. Harrison 156 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Harrison 156 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1968
    State v. Kline, 266 Minn. 372 , 124 N. W. (2d) 416 , certiorari denied, 376 U. S. 962 , 84 S. Ct. 1124 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 980; State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628 ; Cady v. United States, 54 App. D. C. 10, 293 F. 829 .
  • State v. Olson 156 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Olson 156 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1968
    595.07; State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628 .
  • State v. Intihar 152 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Intihar 152 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 1967
    3 State v. Thompson, 273 Minn. 1 , 139 N. W. (2d) 490 ; State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628 ; Donovan v. Dixon, 261 Minn. 455 , 113 N. W. (2d) 432 .
  • State v. Collins 150 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Collins 150 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1967
    This was made clear in the recent case of State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48, 52 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628, 631 , wherein this court said: “In passing upon the weight and sufficiency of the evidence we can *470 only repeat that the scope of our review is limited to ascertaining whether under the evidence contained in the record the jury could reasonably find the accused guilty of the offense charge
  • State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
    In State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48, 52 , 136 N. W. (2d) 628, 631 , we said: “In passing upon the weight and sufficiency of the evidence we can only repeat that the scope of our review is limited to ascertaining whether under the evidence contained in the record the jury could reasonably find the accused guilty of the offense charged.