Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Olson, 133 N.W.2d 489.

40 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See State v. Olson , (holding that “the court on its own motion should have refused to accept defendant’s plea of guilty” when the defendant refused to testify that he committed the offense); -57 (Minn. 1964) (invalidating a guilty plea when the defendant “denied the commission of
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Ct. 1463, 1470 (1970) (stating that a guilty plea may not be the product of “overbearing the will of the defendant”); -52 (Minn. 1983) (“The [district] court should not accept the plea unless the record supports the conclusion that the defendant actually committed an offense at least as serious as the crime to which he is pleading guilty.”); (holding district court erred in accepting guilty plea to burglary where defendant denied entering building).
State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
Compare, State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , [1965].” As appears from the quotation, this court has adopted a rather expansive construction of the statutory definition of “premeditation.” 3 Extensive planning and calculated deliberation need not be shown by the prosecution.
State v. Robb 195 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1972
State v. Robb 195 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1972
This case is not like State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , where this court held that a guilty plea should not have been accepted because, in making such plea, defendant at the same time made statements inconsistent with his guilt.
State v. Hall 176 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1970
State v. Hall 176 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1970
This court upheld informations similar to the one in this case in State v. Golden, 86 Minn. 206 , (an information charging defendant with breaking and entering “the warehouse of Halvorson-Richards Co.”), and in State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 (an information charging defendant with burglarizing “a building commonly known as Thompson’s Body Shop”).
State v. Williams 163 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1969
State v. Williams 163 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1969
See, Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 ; State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 ; State ex rel.
Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968
Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968
See, State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 ; State v. Jones, supra.
State v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
State v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
It is questionable at this time if the trial court should have accepted the plea, see, State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N.W.
State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
It is questionable at this time if the trial court should have accepted the plea, see State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 ; State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 , but we recognize the fact that the state has not yet had an opportunity to present evidence on this question.
State Ex Rel. Oney v. Tahash 152 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1967
State Ex Rel. Oney v. Tahash 152 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1967
10 Cf. State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 ; State v. Minton, 276 Minn. 213 , 149 N. W. (2d) 384 .
State Ex Rel. Brunner v. Tahash 151 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 1967
State Ex Rel. Brunner v. Tahash 151 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 1967
Defendant argues also that the court on its own motion should have refused to accept his plea of guilty because “[t]he record shows * * * that [he] was not asked whether he understood the nature of the charge against him and the consequences of his plea of guilty.” He cites State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329, 332 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489, 491 , where the defendant had stated, “I was not inside of the Thompson Body Shop but I will give you a plea of guilty.” Here, the following exchange took place: “The C
State v. Fagerstrom 151 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1967
State v. Fagerstrom 151 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1967
On appeal defendant relies for reversal on State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 , and State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 .
State v. Poelakker 148 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1967
State v. Poelakker 148 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1967
Compare, State v. Youngren, 275 Minn. 388 , 147 N. W. (2d) 370 ; State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , *47 127 N. W. (2d) 153 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 .
State v. Youngren 147 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1966
State v. Youngren 147 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1966
3 State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 .
State Ex Rel. Fruhrman v. Tahash 146 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Fruhrman v. Tahash 146 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1966
Compare, State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 .
State v. Porter 143 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1966
State v. Porter 143 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1966
Grattan v. Tahash, 262 Minn. 18 , 113 N. W. (2d) 342 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 ; State v. Jones, 234 Minn. 438 , 48 N. W. (2d) 662 .
State Ex Rel. Schwirtz v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Schwirtz v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1966
Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 ; State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 .
State v. Ingram 141 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1966
State v. Ingram 141 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1966
Grattan v. Tahash, 262 Minn. 18 , 113 N. W. (2d) 342 ; State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 ; State ex rel.
State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
Grattan v. Tahash, 262 Minn. 18 , 113 N. W. (2d) 342 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 ; and State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 , where statements made by the respective defendants imposed upon the trial court the duty to enter a plea of not guilty in behalf of the defendant.
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Tahash 136 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1965
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Tahash 136 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1965
1 See, State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 .
State v. Anderson 134 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1965
State v. Anderson 134 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1965
Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 , relied upon by defendant; and State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 .