Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Perry, 142 N.W.2d 573.
- State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael Nowacki 880 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State v. Dressel 765 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-
State v. Dressel
765 N.W.2d 419
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1, 12-13 , -62 (Minn.1989) (holding that admission of reference to polygraph was harmless error).
- State v. Johnson 616 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 2000
-
State v. Johnson
616 N.W.2d 720
Minn. 2000
As such, it was properly focused on “references to the evidence rather than to matters ⅜ ⅜ * which serve to divert the minds of the jurors from facts to which their consideration should be given* * State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1, 14
- State v. Peterson 530 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
State v. Peterson
530 N.W.2d 843
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1 , the prosecutor stated in closing: None of us are safe until we take care of those who maraud, murder, kill, and steal.
- State v. Porter 526 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1995
-
State v. Porter
526 N.W.2d 359
Minn. 1995
In State v. Petry, 274 Minn. 1 , where the prosecutor stated that the defendant was the type of person who prowled at night, and if the jurors wanted to keep the streets safe and sleep at night, they had to convict, we held that it was unlikely the instruction could negate the harm caused by the prosecutor's statements.
- State v. Walsh 495 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1993
-
State v. Walsh
495 N.W.2d 602
Minn. 1993
See, (argument must be limited to the facts in evidence and the reasonable inferences flowing therefrom); State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1, 14 , (prosecutor’s argument should not seek to inflame or prejudice the jury against the defendant by improper assertions).
- Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett 476 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett
476 N.W.2d 166
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1, 12
- State v. DeWald 463 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1990
-
State v. DeWald
463 N.W.2d 741
Minn. 1990
(citing State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1 , ).
- State v. Schaeffer 452 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
State v. Schaeffer
452 N.W.2d 719
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
2248 , 90 L.Ed.2d 694 (1986); State v. Hill, 312 Minn. 514, 525 , State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401, 407 , State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1, 12-13 , pet.
- State v. Fenney 448 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1989
-
State v. Fenney
448 N.W.2d 54
Minn. 1989
State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209, 220-22 , -66 (1952); State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1, 12-13
- State v. Conklin 406 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Distinguished
State v. Conklin
406 N.W.2d 84
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
For example, in State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1, 12-13 , the court refused to permit favorable inferences to be drawn either indirectly or directly from specific and identifiable references to a lie detector test during trial.
- State v. Erickson 403 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State v. Erickson
403 N.W.2d 281
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401, 407 , State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1, 12-13
- State v. Rose 353 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Rose
353 N.W.2d 565
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(citing State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1 , ).
- State v. Stufflebean 329 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1983
-
State v. Stufflebean
329 N.W.2d 314
Minn. 1983
See State v. White, 295 Minn. 217 , State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1 , State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124
- State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980
-
State v. Clark
296 N.W.2d 359
Minn. 1980
State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1
- State v. Goblirsch 246 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1976
-
State v. Goblirsch
246 N.W.2d 12
Minn. 1976
State v. Simonson, 298 Minn. 235 , State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1 , State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209
- State v. Simonson 214 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1974
-
State v. Simonson
214 N.W.2d 679
Minn. 1974
See, State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1 , State v. Anderson, 261 Minn. 431 , State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209
- State v. Williams 210 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1973
-
State v. Williams
210 N.W.2d 21
Minn. 1973
10 State v. Prettyman, 293 Minn. 493 , State v. Jones, 277 Minn. 174 , State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1 , State v. Schwartz, 266 Minn. 104
- State v. Prettyman 198 N.W.2d 156 Minn. 1972
-
State v. Prettyman
198 N.W.2d 156
Minn. 1972
See, State v. Jones, 277 Minn. 174 , State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1 , State v. Schwartz, 266 Minn. 104 , State v. Gulbrandsen, 238 Minn. 508
- State v. Mastrian 171 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1969
-
State v. Mastrian
171 N.W.2d 695
Minn. 1969
State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1 , 142 N. W. (2d) 573 .