Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kroeger v. Lee, 132 N.W.2d 727.

48 citing documents.

Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett 490 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1992
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett 490 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1992
(quoting Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , -30 (1965)).
Westbrock v. Marshalltown Mfg. Co. 473 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Westbrock v. Marshalltown Mfg. Co. 473 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(quoting Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , ).
Johnson v. Southern Minnesota MacHinery Sales, Inc. 442 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Johnson v. Southern Minnesota MacHinery Sales, Inc. 442 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(quoting Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , ).
Friesens, Inc. v. Larson 438 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Friesens, Inc. v. Larson 438 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
*448 , 368 n. 2 (Minn.1979) (citing Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , ).
Keenan v. Hydra-Mac, Inc. 422 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Keenan v. Hydra-Mac, Inc. 422 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(quoting Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , ).
Lennon v. Pieper 411 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lennon v. Pieper 411 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ponticas, d at 915 , (citing Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , -30 (1965)).
Andrade v. Ellefson 375 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Andrade v. Ellefson 375 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75
Hedlund v. Hedlund 371 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hedlund v. Hedlund 371 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
at 100 , citing Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78
Maanum v. Aust 364 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Maanum v. Aust 364 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
at 100 (citing Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , -30 (1965)).
Ponticas v. K.M.S. Investments 331 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1983
Ponticas v. K.M.S. Investments 331 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1983
Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , -30 (1967).
Rieger v. Zackoski 321 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1982
Rieger v. Zackoski 321 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1982
In Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75 , we listed the prerequisites to giving such an instruction: *21 For a cause to be superseding, the following elements must be present: (1) Its harmful effects must have occurred after the original negligence; (2) it must not have been brought about by the original negligence; (3) it must active
Regan v. Stromberg 285 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1979
Regan v. Stromberg 285 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1979
Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
In Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , we set out the four elements of intervening cause: (1) its harmful effects must have occurred after the original negligence; (2) it must not have been brought about by the original negligence; (3) it must actively work to bring about a result which would not otherwise have followed fr
Oltmans Ex Rel. Oltmans v. Orthopaedic & Fracture Clinic, P.A. 278 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1979
Oltmans Ex Rel. Oltmans v. Orthopaedic & Fracture Clinic, P.A. 278 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1979
Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75
Hughes v. Keller 224 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1974
Hughes v. Keller 224 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1974
222 Minn. 454 , Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75
Crohn v. Dupre 190 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1971
Crohn v. Dupre 190 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1971
2 As stated in Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , 132 N. W. (2d) 727, 729 , “[f]or a cause to be superseding, the following elements must be present: (1) Its harmful effects must have occurred after the original negligence; (2) it must not have been brought about by the original negligence; (3) it must actively work to bring about a result which would not other
Shafer Ex Rel. Shafer v. Gaylord 176 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1970
Soltis v. Geary 176 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1970
Soltis v. Geary 176 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1970
E. g., Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75 , 132 N. W. (2d) 727 .
Shafer Ex Rel. Shafer v. Gaylord 176 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1970
In the more recent case of Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , 132 N. W. (2d) 727, 729 , we pointed out that an intervening, superseding cause is one having the following elements: <<* * * (i) Its harmful effects must have occurred after the original negligence; (2) it must not have been brought about by the original negligence; (3) it must actively work to bring abou
Yellow Taxi Co. of Minneapolis v. MacMillan 169 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1969
Yellow Taxi Co. of Minneapolis v. MacMillan 169 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1969
Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , 132 N. W. (2d) 727, 729 ; Cahill v. Peterson, 277 Minn. 26, 31 , 151 N. W. (2d) 258, 261 .
Corcoran v. Perry 162 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1968
Corcoran v. Perry 162 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1968
See, Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75 , 132 N. W. (2d) 727 .
Knoll v. Nussbaum 162 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1968
Knoll v. Nussbaum 162 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1968
Although there, was competent medical evidence introduced by defendant in support of his claim that there was no permanent damage to plaintiffs resulting from the accident, we believe that affirmance is indicated by such decisions of this court as Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75 , 132 N. W. (2d) 727 , and Colgan v. Raymond, 275 Minn. 219 , 146 N. W. (2d) 530 .
Higman v. Independent School District No. 37 161 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1968
Higman v. Independent School District No. 37 161 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1968
Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75 , 132 N. W. (2d) 727 .
Cahill v. Peterson 151 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1967
Cahill v. Peterson 151 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1967
As the jury was instructed and as stated in Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , 132 N. W. (2d) 727 , 729: “* * * For a cause to be superseding, the following elements must be present: (1) Its harmful effects must have occurred after the original negligence; (2) it must not have been brought about by the original negligence; (3) it must actively work to bring about a result which would not o
Roberts v. Donaldson 149 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1967
Roberts v. Donaldson 149 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1967
In Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , 132 N. W. (2d) 727, 729 , this court said that for a cause to be intervening four elements are necessary: “* * (i) Its harmful effects must have occurred after the original negligence; (2) it must not have been brought about by the original negligence; (3) it must actively work to bring about a result which woul