Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Branchaud v. Hedman, 130 N.W.2d 628.

30 citing documents.

Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
Norman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 409 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Norman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 409 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See State v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375, 379 , -31 (1964), cert.
State v. Valstad 165 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1969
State v. Valstad 165 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1969
Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 , certiorari dismissed, 381 U. S. 907 , 85 S. Ct. 1456 , 14 L. ed. (2d) 289; State v. Clifford, 273 Minn. 249 , 141 N. W. (2d) 124 ; State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 .
State v. Fish 159 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1968
State v. Fish 159 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1968
Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 , certiorari dismissed, 381 U. S. 907 , 85 S. Ct. 1456 , 14 L. ed. (2d) 289; State v. Clifford, 273 Minn. 249 , 141 N. W. (2d) 124 ; State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 .
State v. Purdy 153 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1967
State v. Purdy 153 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1967
Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 , certiorari dismissed, 381 U. S. 907 , 85 S. Ct. 1456 , 14 L. ed. (2d) 289.
State Ex Rel. Danielsen v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Danielsen v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1966
Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375, 376 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628, 629 , certiorari dismissed, 381 U. S. 907 , 85 S. Ct. 1456 , 14 L. ed. (2d) 289; State v. Clark, 270 Minn. 181 , 132 N. W. (2d) 811 ; State ex rel.
State v. Clifford 141 N.W.2d 124 Minn. 1966
State v. Clifford 141 N.W.2d 124 Minn. 1966
Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 , certiorari dismissed, 381 U. S. 907 , 85 S. Ct. 1456 , 14 L. ed. (2d) 289; State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260, 269 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327, 333 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. Ct. 141 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 94.
State v. Holmes 140 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1966
State v. Holmes 140 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1966
Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 , certiorari dismissed, 381 U. S. 907 , 85 S. Ct. 1456 , 14 L. ed. (2d) 289; State v. Huffstutler, 269 Minn. 153 , 130 N. W. (2d) 347 ; State v. Gebhard, 272 Minn. 336 , 137 N. W. (2d) 168 ; 17 Dunnell, Dig.
State Ex Rel. Ogg v. Tahash 140 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Ogg v. Tahash 140 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1966
Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 ; State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 ; United States v. Ventresca, 380 U. S. 102 , 85 S. Ct. 741 , 13 L. ed. (2d) 684.
State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 , certiorari dismissed, 381 U. S. 907 , 85 S. Ct. 1456 , 14 L. ed. (2d) 289, and State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. Ct. 141 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 94, are cited by both parties in support of their respective contentions.
State Ex Rel. Holm v. Tahash 139 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1965
State Ex Rel. Holm v. Tahash 139 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1965
Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375, 376 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628, 629 ; State v. Clark, 270 Minn. 181 , 132 N. W. (2d) 811 ; State ex rel.
State v. Gebhard 137 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1965
State v. Gebhard 137 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1965
Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 , we held that evidence obtained as a result of a search of defendant’s automobile without a warrant was admissible where defendant consented to the search.
State v. Kinderman 136 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1965
State v. Olson 135 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1965
State v. Olson 135 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1965
Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 , it appeared to be the claim of the defendant that the evidence used against him was the product of an exploratory search without probable cause in violation of his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.
State v. Sorenson 134 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1965
State v. Sorenson 134 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1965
Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375, 378 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 , 630: “In the argument before this court it appears to be the claim of defendant that the evidence used against him was the product of an exploratory search without probable cause in violation of his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.
State v. Collins 132 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1964
State v. Collins 132 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1964
Branchaud v. Hedman, 269 Minn. 375 , 130 N. W. (2d) 628 , decided September 25, 1964.