Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Spreigl, 139 N.W.2d 167.

754 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Nathan Charles Robert Schwartz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Charles Robert Schwartz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(explaining that evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is commonly known as Spreigl evidence and citing State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, ).
State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Nasson Chaney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Francis Allen Skinness Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Nasson Chaney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But 404(b) has an exception whereby such evidence is admissible to prove “motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” Id.; see also State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491
State of Minnesota v. Francis Allen Skinness Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 490
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b); see also State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 490
State of Minnesota v. David Lester McHan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lester McHan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
She then picked up her one-year-old child, thinking that appellant would not assault her if she was carrying a baby, but he pushed her, she fell 1 Evidence of other crimes or bad acts is “Spreigl evidence.” see State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State of Minnesota v. Tyrone Bill Harper Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tyrone Bill Harper Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b); 4 State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 490-91
State of Minnesota v. Jason Lamont Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Brian J. Machacek Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Lamont Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b); see State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 490-91
State of Minnesota v. Brian J. Machacek Minn. Ct. App. 2015
For 15 example, evidence of a defendant’s prior conviction may be admissible for non-character purposes such as proving the defendant’s “motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” See id.; see also State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491–94, –172 (1965).
State of Minnesota v. Paul Joseph Welle 870 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Paul Joseph Welle 870 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 2015
1 See State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491
State of Minnesota v. James Michael Soderbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. James Michael Soderbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 490
State of Minnesota v. Leslie Lindsey Treadwell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Leslie Lindsey Treadwell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Evidence of other crimes or bad acts is characterized as “Spreigl evidence” after the supreme court’s decision in State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State of Minnesota v. Levi Chen-Wah Leong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Levi Chen-Wah Leong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b); see State 10 v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 490–91
State of Minnesota v. Lawrence Craig Ogris Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Lawrence Craig Ogris Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This general exclusionary rule of other-acts evidence, often referred to as Spreigl evidence after State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, protects a defendant’s constitutional right to a fair trial.
State of Minnesota v. Roxanne Kay DeFlorin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Roxanne Kay DeFlorin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 490
State of Minnesota v. Mario Gonzalez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Mario Gonzalez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b); see generally State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State of Minnesota v. Otis Ray Mays Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Otis Ray Mays Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Under this exception, the state may offer “any evidence which is otherwise relevant upon the issue of the defendant’s guilt of the crime with which he was charged,” including all relevant 1 State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, sets forth parameters for admissibility of other crimes or “bad acts” evidence.
State of Minnesota v. Elvis Joko Porte Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Elvis Joko Porte Minn. Ct. App. 2015
I. Porte contends that A.R.’s testimony that Porte gave him money and drugs in exchange for S.A.’s
State of Minnesota v. Albert Leroy Goranson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Albert Leroy Goranson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b) (2012); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 490
State v. Campbell 861 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 2015
State v. Campbell 861 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 2015
404(b); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , 491
State of Minnesota v. Rodney Cap McCowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rodney Cap McCowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b); see generally State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State of Minnesota v. Donald James Helps Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Donald James Helps Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Alvis Gayles, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Alvis Gayles, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b); see generally State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Denzel Cross Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Denzel Cross Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Such prior-bad-acts evidence is often referred to as Spreigl evidence, after State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State of Minnesota v. Quince Raymond Campbell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ernest Henry Chouinard Minn. Ct. App. 2014