Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Spreigl, 139 N.W.2d 167.

754 citing documents.

State v. Shannon 583 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 1998
Such evidence of other crimes (often referred to in Minnesota as Spreigl evidence after State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , ) may be admissible for other purposes, however, “such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” Minn. R. Evid.
State v. Cross 577 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1998
State v. Cross 577 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1998
State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 490
State v. Kennedy 572 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Kennedy 572 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
*61 The state, pursuant to State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , gave appellant notice before trial of its intent to introduce evidence of this subsequent incident.
State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997
State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997
see generally State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State v. Smith 563 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Smith 563 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
404(b); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491
State v. Nunn 561 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1997
State v. Nunn 561 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1997
See also State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 490
State v. Harris 560 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1997
State v. Harris 560 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1997
Id.; see also State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491
State v. Kortkamp 560 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Kortkamp 560 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 495-96 , -72 (1965).
State v. Orsello 554 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1996
State v. Orsello 554 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1996
See State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State v. Spaeth 552 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1996
State v. Spaeth 552 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1996
404(b); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State v. Lewis 547 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1996
State v. Lewis 547 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1996
See State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , State v. Billstrom, 276 Minn. 174
State v. Townsend 546 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1996
State v. Townsend 546 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1996
In State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , we determined that evidence relating to offenses that were a part of the “immediate episode for which defendant is being tried” may be admissible.
State v. Gorman 546 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 1996
State v. Gorman 546 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 1996
State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State v. Fallin 540 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1995
State v. Fallin 540 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1995
1 In State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , and in State v. Billstrom, 276 Minn. 174 , we adopted procedural safeguards to govern the determination of the admissibility of other-crime evidence pursuant to Rule 404(b).
State v. Cogshell 538 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1995
State v. Cogshell 538 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1995
Each verbal formulation of a particular substantive or procedural principle relating to the admission of other-crime evidence pursuant to this rule has been honed over time in a series of cases going back to State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , and State v. Billstrom, 276 Minn. 174
State v. Robinson 536 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1995
State v. Robinson 536 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1995
404(b) is collectively referred to as Spreigl evidence, labeled as such for a landmark case addressing the admissibility of such evidence, State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State v. Lanz-Terry 535 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1995
State v. Lanz-Terry 535 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1995
State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State v. Bolte 530 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1995
State v. Bolte 530 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1995
We announced many of these requirements in State v. Billstrom, 276 Minn. 174 , and State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State v. Buhl 520 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Buhl 520 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491
State v. Steinbuch 514 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1994
State v. Steinbuch 514 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1994
See State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State v. Orfi 511 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Orfi 511 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 494-95 , -72 (1965).
State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491
State v. Sullivan 502 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1993
State v. Sullivan 502 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1993
See State v. Spriegl, 272 Minn. 488
State v. Wiskow 501 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Wiskow 501 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 496-97 , -73 (1965) (requiring written notice “within a reasonable time before trial” of planned trial use of other alleged offenses or acts); see also Minn.R.Crim.P.
State v. Swanson 498 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1993
State v. Swanson 498 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1993
See State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
State v. Wermerskirchen 497 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1993