DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Spreigl, 139 N.W.2d 167.

754 citing documents.

  • State v. Rucker 752 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    404(b); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 493
  • State v. Meyer 749 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Meyer 749 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 496
  • State v. Smith 749 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Smith 749 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    404(b), also called the Spreigl rule — named for the case, State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , establishing the same law before the codification of the evidence rules in Minnesota — controls the issue here.
  • State v. Clark 738 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Clark 738 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2007
    See State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491
  • State v. Fields 730 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Fields 730 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 2007
    -03 (Minn.1991); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
  • State v. Meldrum 724 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Meldrum 724 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
  • State v. Kendell 723 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Kendell 723 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 2006
    (quoting State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 497 , ).
  • State v. Gomez 721 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Gomez 721 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 2006
    404(b); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
  • State v. Mayhorn 720 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Mayhorn 720 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2006
    See State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
  • State v. Wright 719 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Wright 719 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 2006
    But other-crimes or Spreigl evidence may be admitted “for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” Id.; State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491
  • State v. Ness 707 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Penkaty 708 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Penkaty 708 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2006
    State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 493 , -71 (1965).
  • State v. Ness 707 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Montgomery 707 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Montgomery 707 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    In Minnesota, admissible 404(b) evidence is known- as Spreigl evidence after State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
  • State v. McLeod 705 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2005
  • State v. McLeod 705 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2005
    404(b); see also State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 497
  • State v. Palubicki 700 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Palubicki 700 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2005
    See id.; see also State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
  • State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
    404(b), and State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 497
  • State v. Wemyss 696 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Wemyss 696 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 496-97 , -73 (1965).
  • State v. Courtney 696 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Courtney 696 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 2005
    404(b); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
  • Angus v. State 695 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 2005
  • Angus v. State 695 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 2005
    In State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , we confirmed our adherence “to the common-law rule excluding evidence connecting a defendant with other crimes, except for purposes of impeachment * ⅜ * if he takes the stand on his own behalf.” Id.
  • State v. Washington 693 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Washington 693 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Washington 693 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2005
    404(b); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
  • State v. Washington 693 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2005
    404(b); State v. Spreigl , 272 Minn. 488
  • State v. Babcock 685 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Babcock 685 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    In Minnesota, other crimes evidence is often referred to as Spreigl evidence after the supreme court’s decision in State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
  • State v. Courtney 682 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Courtney 682 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 497 , Minn. R.Crim.
  • State v. Blom 682 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2004
  • State v. McCoy 682 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2004
  • State v. Blom 682 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2004
    Evidence of other crimes or bad acts by a defendant offered to show identity, plan, knowledge, or modus operandi is commonly referred to as Spreigl evidence after our decision in State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
  • State v. McCoy 682 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2004
    State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488
  • Ture v. State 681 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2004