Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Collins v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 135 N.W.2d 503.

24 citing documents.

Followed Amy Sweasy Tamburino, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Exch., (quotation omitted); see also Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Mgmt.
Hayley Elizabeth Kytta, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Exch., (emphasis added); see also Staffing Specifix , d at 128 (interpreting “incurred” as an unambiguous term meaning to become liable or subject to expenses).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
services.” 271 Minn. 239, 241 , (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Swanson v. Brewster 784 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2010
Swanson v. Brewster 784 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2010
Exch., 271 Minn. 239, 244-45 , (interpreting an insurance contract, specifically the word “incurred,” to mean that the insurer who initially denied its insured’s claim must pay the billed amounts, rather than the amount the insured actually paid his medical providers).
Foust v. McFairland 698 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Foust v. McFairland 698 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Exchange, 271 Minn. 239, 244 , (holding that a no-fault insurer must reimburse an insured the amount of medical expenses incurred and “not the amount he paid as a result of a collateral transaction”).
Tezak v. Bachke 698 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Tezak v. Bachke 698 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
American Family Insurance Group v. Kiess 680 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
American Family Insurance Group v. Kiess 680 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Exch., 271 Minn. 239, 244, (holding that a no-fault insurer must reimburse an insured the amount of medical expenses incurred and “not the amount he paid as a result of a collateral transaction”).
Stout v. AMCO Insurance Co. 645 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 2002
Stout v. AMCO Insurance Co. 645 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 2002
Our decision in Collins v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 271 Minn. 239 , is instructive on the question of how to calculate the medical expense incurred by Stout in this case.
Hanson v. Thom 636 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Hanson v. Thom 636 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Exch., 271 Minn. 239, 244 , (footnote omitted).
Samsel v. Allstate Insurance 19 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Coconino County v. Fund Administrators Ass'n 719 P.2d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. Loescher 291 N.W.2d 216 Minn. 1980
Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. Loescher 291 N.W.2d 216 Minn. 1980
Exch., 271 Minn. 239, 245, accord, D. Dobbs, Remedies, § 3.6, at 185 (1973).
Local 1140, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance 165 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 1969
Local 1140, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance 165 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 1969
See Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312 , ; Wells v. Minneapolis B. & A. Assn., 122 Minn. 327 , ; Collins v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 271 Minn. 239 , ; and Beschnett v. Farmers Equitable Ins.
Beschnett v. Farmers Equitable Insurance Co. 146 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1966
Beschnett v. Farmers Equitable Insurance Co. 146 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1966
271 Minn. 239, 245 , 135 N. W. (2d) 503, 507 .