DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mastrian, 171 N.W.2d 695.

65 citing documents.

  • State v. Johnson 192 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Johnson 192 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1971
    State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 58 , certiorari denied, 397 U. S. 1049 , 90 S. Ct. 1381 , 25 L. ed. 2d 662 (1970); State v. Mitchell, 282 Minn. 113, 122 , State v. Uglum, 175 Minn. 607
  • State v. Miller 185 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Miller 185 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1971
    State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , 171 N. W. (2d) 695 , certiorari denied, 397 U. S. 1049 , 90 S. Ct. 1381 , 25 L. ed. (2d) 662.
  • State v. Jensen 184 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Jensen 184 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1971
    7 Wigmore, Evidence (3 ed.) § 2060; State v. Durnam, 73 Minn. 150 , ; State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , ; State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , 171 N. W. (2d) 695 , certiorari denied, 397 U. S. 1049 , 90 S. Ct. 1381 , 25 L. ed. (2d) 662, among others.
  • Thompson v. State 183 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1971
  • Thompson v. State 183 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1971
    State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , 171 N. W. (2d) 695 , certiorari denied, 397 U. S. 1049 , 90 S. Ct. 1381 , 25 L. ed. (2d) 662.
  • State v. Stark 179 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Matousek 178 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Matousek 178 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1970
    State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , 171 N. W. (2d) 695 ; State v. Hopfe, 249 Minn. 464 , 82 N. W. (2d) 681 .
  • State v. Morales 176 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Morales 176 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1970
    State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , 171 N. W. (2d) 695 ; Beck v. Ohio, 379 U. S. 89 , 85 S. Ct. 223 , 13 L. ed. (2d) 142; Recznik v. City of Lorain, 393 U. S. 166 , 89 S. Ct. 342 , 21 L. ed. (2d) 317.
  • State v. Pietraszewski 172 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Pietraszewski 172 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1969
    In State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 171 , N. W. (2d) 695, we held that if an infringement of a person’s Fourth Amendment rights is challenged, the infringement becomes presumptively invalid, and the burden is on the state to justify it as one which is not violative of the Fourth Amendment guaranty against invasion of privacy.