Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mastrian, 171 N.W.2d 695.

65 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Lamont Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Lamont Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 56
  • State v. Askerooth 681 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 2004
  • State v. Ture 632 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 2001
  • State v. Ture 632 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 2001
    (state bears the burden of establishing the existence of an emergency justifying a warrantless entry under the emergency exception to the warrant requirement); State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 56 , (upon challenge to a warrantless arrest, state has the burden of proving that the arrest did not violate the Fourth Amendment).
  • State v. Hummel 483 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Hummel 483 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1992
    “A defendant is entitled to a fair trial but not a perfect one.” State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 75 , cert.
  • State v. Kaul 457 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Kaul 457 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    See State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 66 , cert.
  • State v. Brown 455 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. King 414 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. King 414 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 73 , cert.
  • State v. Roden 380 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Roden 380 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 75 , cert.
  • State v. Snyder 375 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Snyder 375 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 75
  • State v. Kitto 373 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Kitto 373 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1985
    Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531 , State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , cert.
  • State v. Southard 360 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Southard 360 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. Mast-rian, 285 Minn. 51, 75
  • State v. Jacobson 326 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Jacobson 326 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 1982
    See also State v. Hill, 312 Minn. 514 , State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51
  • State v. Caldwell 322 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Caldwell 322 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1982
    See, e.g., State v. Hill, 312 Minn. 514, 523 , State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 73 , cert.
  • State v. Filipi 297 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Filipi 297 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1980
    1 See also State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 54-55 , -99 (1969), cert.
  • Martin v. State 295 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1980
  • Martin v. State 295 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1980
    State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58
  • State v. Stewart 276 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Stewart 276 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1979
    See, e. g., State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 75 , certiorari denied, 397 U.S. 1049 , 90 S.Ct.
  • State v. Merrill 274 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Merrill 274 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1978
    found that— “ * * * [a]ny arrest made without a warrant, if challenged by the defendant, is presumptively invalid, and the burden is upon the state to justify it as one not only authorized by § 629.34 but also as one not violative of the guarantee of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution against any invasion of privacy except upon a showing of probable cause.” State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 56 , certiorari denied, 397 U.S. 1049 , 90 S.Ct.
  • State v. Hill 253 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Hill 253 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1977
    State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , State v. Thompson, 273 Minn. 1
  • Gruenhagen v. Larson 246 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1976
  • Gruenhagen v. Larson 246 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1976
    1 See, State v. Smith, 221 Minn. 359 , State v. Nelson, 91 Minn. 143 , State v. Mohrbacher, 173 Minn. 567 , State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , certiorari denied, 397 U. S. 1049 , 90 S. Ct. 1381 , 25 L. ed. 2d 662 (1970).
  • State v. Morgan 246 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Morgan 246 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1976
    631.02; State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 70 , certiorari denied, 397 U. S. 1049 , 90 S. Ct. 1381 , 25 L. ed. 2d 662 (1970).
  • State v. St. Christopher 232 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 1975
  • State v. St. Christopher 232 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 1975
    See, State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 72
  • Kelsey v. State 214 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1974
  • Kelsey v. State 214 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1974
    State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , certiorari denied, 397 U. S. 1049 , 90 S. Ct. 1381 , 25 L. ed. 2d 662 (1970).
  • State v. King 208 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 1973
  • State v. King 208 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 1973
    The motion, as a general matter, was in effect a demand for unlimited pretrial discovery, which, as we held in State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51, 63 , certiorari denied, 397 U. S. 1049 , 90 S. Ct. 1381 , 25 L. ed. 2d 662 (1970), is neither authorized nor required.
  • State v. Martin 197 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Martin 197 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1972
    It must be remembered that in criminal cases the defendant is not required to disclose anything.” In State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , certiorari denied, 397 U. S. 1049 , 90 S. Ct. 1381 , 25 L. ed. 2d 662 (1970), the defendant made a pretrial motion for an order directing the state to produce for inspection by defendant all statements of witnesses, material used to refresh witnesses’ recollection, the notes, memoranda, and
  • State v. Chytracek 196 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Chytracek 196 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1972
    The trial court’s disposition of these objections is supported by a number of recent decisions, including State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. Ct. 141 , 11 L. ed. 2d 94 (1963); State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , certiorari denied, 397 U. S. 1049 , 90 S. Ct. 1381 , 25 L. ed. 2d 662 (1970); State v. Hayes, 292 Minn. 399
  • State v. Falcone 195 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Falcone 195 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1972
    State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , certiorari denied, 397 U.S. 1049 , 90 S. Ct. 1381 , 25 L. ed. 2d 662 (1970).