Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Dinneen v. Tahash, 136 N.W.2d 847.

45 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(noting that “conventional notions of finality of litigation may not stand in the way of review where an infringement of constitutional rights is alleged and that the principle of res judicata is no longer applicable to habeas corpus proceedings”).
Terrance Friend, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
State v. Knight 192 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1971
State v. Knight 192 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1971
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , Cable v. State, 284 Minn. 89 , Swanson v. State, 284 Minn. 66 , State ex rel.
Doan v. State 186 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1971
Doan v. State 186 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1971
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 ; State ex rel.
Clausen v. State 181 N.W.2d 471 Minn. 1970
Clausen v. State 181 N.W.2d 471 Minn. 1970
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 .
Morrissey v. State 174 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1970
Morrissey v. State 174 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1970
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 ; Thompson v. State, 284 Minn. 274 , 170 N. W. (2d) 101 .
Cable v. State 169 N.W.2d 391 Minn. 1969
Cable v. State 169 N.W.2d 391 Minn. 1969
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 ; State ex rel.
Swanson v. State 169 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1969
Swanson v. State 169 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1969
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 .
State Ex Rel. Ford v. Tahash 154 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
State Ex Rel. Ford v. Tahash 154 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 .
State v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
State v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , ; State ex rel.
State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 ; State ex rel.
State v. Kobi 151 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1967
State v. Kobi 151 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1967
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 , and State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 .
State Ex Rel. Brunner v. Tahash 151 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 1967
State Ex Rel. Brunner v. Tahash 151 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 1967
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 , this court reviewed procedures with reference to the application of habeas corpus as a postconviction remedy in the light of three recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court.
State Ex Rel. Jones v. Tahash 149 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1967
State Ex Rel. Jones v. Tahash 149 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1967
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7, 13 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 , 851: “* * * [A] presumption of validity is accorded a record of proceed *191 ings resulting in judgment of conviction unless a jurisdictional defect appears on the face of the record.” Mere error in the proceedings which resulted in the detention of one seeking habeas corpus would not be suf
State Ex Rel. Riendeau v. Tahash 148 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1967
State Ex Rel. Riendeau v. Tahash 148 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1967
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7, 13 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847, 851 ; State ex rel.
State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 146 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 1966
State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 146 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 1966
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Gerberding v. Tahash 146 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Gerberding v. Tahash 146 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1966
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 .
State ex rel. Owens v. Tahash 143 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1966
State ex rel. Owens v. Tahash 143 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1966
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 .
State Ex Rel. Schwirtz v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Schwirtz v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1966
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 , we reexamined the procedures with reference to the application of habeas corpus as a postconviction remedy, including those outlined in State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Danielsen v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Danielsen v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1966
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 .
State Ex Rel. Holm v. Tahash 139 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1965
State Ex Rel. Holm v. Tahash 139 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1965
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7, 13 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847, 851 , Noia established that— “* * * conventional notions of finality of litigation may not stand in the way of review where an infringement of constitutional rights is alleged and * * * the principle of res judicata is no longer applicable to habeas corpus proceedings.” As foreshadowed in 194
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Tahash 136 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1965
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Tahash 136 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1965
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 , and State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 , we feel that the better course under the circumstances will be to hear the available evidence in support of defendant’s claim and in rebuttal thereto.
State v. DeCloux 136 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1965
State v. DeCloux 136 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1965
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 , we discussed the impact of Townsend v. Sain, 372 U. S. 293 , 83 S. Ct. 745 , 9 L. ed. (2d) 770; Fay v. Noia, supra; and Sanders v. United States, 373 U. S. 1 , 83 S. Ct. 1068 , 10 L. ed. (2d) 148, with reference to such proceedings and pointed out that where in a postconviction procedure a defen