Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. DeCloux, 136 N.W.2d 657.

29 citing documents.

Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
Doan v. State 186 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1971
Doan v. State 186 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1971
State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 ; State ex rel.
Clausen v. State 181 N.W.2d 471 Minn. 1970
Clausen v. State 181 N.W.2d 471 Minn. 1970
See, also, Hayes v. State, 283 Minn. 544 , 169 N. W. (2d) 9 ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657; State ex rel.
Cable v. State 169 N.W.2d 391 Minn. 1969
Cable v. State 169 N.W.2d 391 Minn. 1969
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 ; State ex rel.
State v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
State v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , ; State ex rel.
State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 ; State ex rel.
State v. Kobi 151 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1967
State v. Kobi 151 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1967
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 , and State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 .
State Ex Rel. Brunner v. Tahash 151 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 1967
State Ex Rel. Brunner v. Tahash 151 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 1967
Smith v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 168 , 136 N. W. (2d) 617 , and State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 , we found circumstances which did require evidentiary hearings and so we remanded the cases for that purpose.
State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 146 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 1966
State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 146 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 1966
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Gerberding v. Tahash 146 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Gerberding v. Tahash 146 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1966
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 .
State ex rel. Owens v. Tahash 143 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1966
State ex rel. Owens v. Tahash 143 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1966
Smith v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 168 , 136 N. W. (2d) 617 ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 .
State Ex Rel. Schwirtz v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Schwirtz v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1966
2 Recently, in State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 , we treated a petition that had been designated as a writ of error coram nobis as a petition in the nature of an application for a writ of habeas corpus in postconviction procedure.
State Ex Rel. Danielsen v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Danielsen v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1966
Smith v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 168, 174 , 136 N. W. (2d) 617, 621 ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Holm v. Tahash 139 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1965
State Ex Rel. Holm v. Tahash 139 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1965
Smith v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 168, 174 , 136 N. W. (2d) 617, 621 ; State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Tahash 136 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1965
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Tahash 136 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1965
Dinneen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 7 , 136 N. W. (2d) 847 , and State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 , we feel that the better course under the circumstances will be to hear the available evidence in support of defendant’s claim and in rebuttal thereto.