Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Newman v. Fjelstad, 137 N.W.2d 181.

30 citing documents.

Buck Blacktop, Inc. v. Gary Contracting and Trucking Company, LLC 929 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Buck Blacktop, Inc. v. Gary Contracting and Trucking Company, LLC 929 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Newman v. Fjelstad , 271 Minn. 514 , , 186 (1965).
In re: Sidney A. Goodman Revocable Trust, U/A/D December 16, 1985 as Amended Minn. Ct. App. 2018
at 870 (quoting Newman v. Fjelstad, 271 Minn. 514, 522, ) (interpreting Minn. R. Civ.
Gassler v. State 787 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 2010
In Re Instructions to Construe Basic Resolution 876 of the Port Authority of St. Paul 772 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 2009
In Re Instructions to Construe Basic Resolution 876 of the Port Authority of St. Paul 772 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 2009
See Newman v. Fjelstad, 271 Minn. 514, 522 , (“ ‘Since what is a reasonable time must be determined in light of all attendant circumstances, intervening rights, loss of proof by or prejudice to the adverse party, the commanding equities of the case, the general desirability that judgments be final and other relevant factors bear
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 739 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 739 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
at 923 (citing Newman v. Fjelstad, 271 Minn. 514, 519 , (iterating rule that release for damages may be set aside on the ground of mutual mistake for injury not discovered until after personal-injury settlement)).
Marriage of Harding v. Harding 620 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Harding v. Harding 620 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See Newman v. Fjelstad, 271 Minn. 514 , (personal-injury claim); Spaulding v. Zimmerman, 263 Minn. 346 , (personal-injury claim).
Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 612 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 2000
Followed Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 612 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 2000
Expanding on this premise in Newman v. Fjelstad, we stated that what is a reasonable time must be determined by considering all attendant circumstances such as: “intervening rights, loss of proof by or prejudice to the adverse party, the commanding equities of the case, the general desirability that judgments be final and other relevant factors ⅜ * * » 271 Minn. 514, 522 , (quotation omitted).
Marriage of Hestekin v. Hestekin 587 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Hestekin v. Hestekin 587 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
John, (unilateral expectation); Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454 , (inexcusable mistake); Newman v. Fjelstad, 271 Minn. 514, 519 , -85 (1965) (unexpected consequences).
Zetah v. Isaacs 428 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Zetah v. Isaacs 428 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Newman v. Fjelstad, 271 Minn. 514, 522-23
Wiethoff v. Williams 413 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wiethoff v. Williams 413 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Newman v. Fjelstad, 271 Minn. 514, 521
Erickson v. Bennett 409 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Erickson v. Bennett 409 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Newman v. Fjelstad, 271 Minn. 514, 522
Volkman v. Volkman 394 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Volkman v. Volkman 394 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See, e.g., Anderson v. Anderson, 288 Minn. 514, 518 , (“Rule 60.02(6) is a residual clause to cover any unforeseen contingency and it is exclusive of clauses (1) through (5)”); Newman v. Fjelstad, 271 Minn. 514, 521-22 , (citing commentary on analogous federal rules stating that “clause (6) is clearly a residual clause to cover unforeseen contingencies; intended to be a means for accomplishing justice in, what may be termed generally, exceptional situations”).
Jeffries v. Gillitzer 225 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1975
Jeffries v. Gillitzer 225 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1975
Schmidt v. Smith, 299 Minn. 103 , Newman v. Fjelstad, 271 Minn. 514 , Doud v. Minneapolis St.
Schmidt v. Smith 216 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1974
Schmidt v. Smith 216 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1974
That unknown and unexpected consequences resulted from known injuries is not sufficient.” This language was quoted with approval in Newman v. Fjelstad, 271 Minn. 514, 519
Anderson v. Anderson 179 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1970
Anderson v. Anderson 179 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1970
Newman v. Fjelstad, 271 Minn. 514 , 137 N. W. (2d) 181 ; Simons v. Schiek’s, Inc. 275 Minn. 132 , 145 N. W. (2d) 548 .
Simons v. Schiek's, Inc. 145 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1966
Simons v. Schiek's, Inc. 145 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1966
Co. 259 Minn. 341 , 107 N. W. (2d) 521 , and Newman v. Fjelstad, 271 Minn. 514 , 137 N. W. (2d) 181 .