Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Theis v. Theis, 135 N.W.2d 740.

27 citing documents.

Leslie E. Sheehy Lee v. Travis W. Kalis, County of Le Sueur Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Leslie E. Sheehy Lee v. Travis W. Kalis, County of Le Sueur Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Allison Catherine Buckner, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Erle Tornstrom v. Jennifer Lynn Tornstrom, n/k/a Jennifer Lynn Klemenhagen 887 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Erle Tornstrom v. Jennifer Lynn Tornstrom, n/k/a Jennifer Lynn Klemenhagen 887 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Theis v. Theis, 271 Minn. 199, 204, d 795, 797 (Minn. App. 1996) (stating settlement agreements are contractual in nature and are binding on the parties).
In Re the ESTATE OF Esther Caroline SULLIVAN, Decedent 868 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the ESTATE OF Esther Caroline SULLIVAN, Decedent 868 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Theis v. Theis, 271 Minn. 199, 206, (holding that subsequent revocatory will must be executed with formalities, including witnesses).
La'Mont Knazze, III, Okhui Cho-Knazze v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., CTX Mortgage Company LLC, d/b/a CTX Mortgage … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
La'Mont Knazze, III, Okhui Cho-Knazze v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., CTX Mortgage Company LLC, d/b/a CTX Mortgage … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Theis v. Theis, 271 Minn. 199, 204
State v. Ramsay 789 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Ramsay 789 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
at 889 (“A valid settlement agreement is final, conclusive, and binding upon the parties.”) (citing Theis v. Theis, 271 Minn. 199, 204 , ); (holding that victim’s parents, who were not parties to civil settlement agreement, could request restitution for losses they incurred as a result of crime), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Arends 786 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Arends 786 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Theis v. Theis, 271 Minn. 199, 204
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLC 773 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2009
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLC 773 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2009
-96 (Minn.1985) (error in notice of appeal regarding the date of judgment for which review was sought was not fatal, where notice was not misleading); Theis v. Theis, 271 Minn. 199, 201 , (mistake in notice of appeal regarding date of order appealed from is immaterial when notice is otherwise adequate).
Chalmers v. Kanawyer 544 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Chalmers v. Kanawyer 544 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
See Theis v. Theis, 271 Minn. 199, 204
Weber v. Sentry Insurance 442 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Weber v. Sentry Insurance 442 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Theis v. Theis, 271 Minn. 199, 204-05 , -45 (1965); Cement, Sand & Gravel Co. v. Agricultural Insurance Co., 225 Minn. 211, 215
Beach v. Anderson 417 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Beach v. Anderson 417 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Theis v. Theis, 271 Minn. 199, 204
Hillmeyer v. Watz 415 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hillmeyer v. Watz 415 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Theis v. Theis, 271 Minn. 199, 204
Harrington v. County of Ramsey 279 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1979
Harrington v. County of Ramsey 279 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1979
In Heim v. El Rehbein & Son, Inc., n. 1 (Minn. 1977), we stated: “ * * * Mere formal defects or clerical errors should be disregarded where they are not misleading and do not prejudice the respondents in any way, and this court, in its discretion, may consider the matter on its merits.” Accord Theis v. Theis, 271 Minn. 199, 200 , n. 1 (1965); In re Estate of Hore, 220 Minn. 365, 369 , second appeal, 222 Minn. 197
Ryan v. Ryan 193 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1971
Ryan v. Ryan 193 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1971
Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369 , Held v. Keller, 135 Minn. 192 , Theis v. Theis, 271 Minn. 199 , 15A C. J. S., Compromise and Settlement, § 7(1); 15 Am.