Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Adelman v. Onischuk, 135 N.W.2d 670.

28 citing documents.

City of Circle Pines Minn. 2022
The Minnesota Watershed Law was originally enacted in 1955, and was recodified, reclarified, and relocated under chapter 103D in 1990, Act of April 6, 1990, ch. 391, 1990 Minn. Laws 354, 446–508.
In re: Guardianship of Laye Komara, minor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Adelman v. Onishuk, 271 Minn. 216, 228, (providing that a statutory remedy “is generally exclusive and will preclude any resort to equity”).
Larson v. State 801 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Larson v. State 801 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In sum, Larson cannot claim that he “h'as been denied an adequate remedy at law when he has simply neglected to invoke available remedies providing for appeal in a timely manner.” See Adelman v. Onischuk, 271 Minn. 216, 228
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See Adelman v. Onischuk, 271 Minn. 216, 228 , (stating “relief against erroneous or illegal assessments will not be granted by a court of equity if the property owner has an adequate remedy at law”); Rosso v. Village of Brooklyn Ctr., 214 Minn. 364, 368 , (emphasizing taxpayer may not maintain suit in equ
In Re 1994 & 1995 Shoreline Improvement Contractor Licenses of Landview Landscaping, Inc. 546 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re 1994 & 1995 Shoreline Improvement Contractor Licenses of Landview Landscaping, Inc. 546 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Adelman v. Onischuk, 271 Minn. 216, 232 , cert.
Pike v. Gunyou 488 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Pike v. Gunyou 488 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
§ 562.02 may have “the salutary effect” of encouraging litigants to sue “before any substantial damage will result from a delay in the prosecution of the project.” Gram , 259 Minn, at 154, d at 559 ; see also Adelman v. Onischuk, 271 Minn. 216, 231 , (person who believes that his constitutional rights are affected by statute must “raise the objection at the earliest available opportunity and exhaust the remedies which may have been provided * * * before he will be permitted to make an attack on
Omdahl v. Hadler 459 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Omdahl v. Hadler 459 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
1289 (1931); Adelman v. Onischuk, 271 Minn. 216 , Rosso v. Village of Brooklyn Center, 214 Minn. 364
TCF Banking & Savings, F.A. v. Loft Homes, Inc. 439 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
TCF Banking & Savings, F.A. v. Loft Homes, Inc. 439 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Finally, appellant cites Adelman v. Onischuk, 271 Minn. 216 , appeal dismissed, cert.
Allstate Sales & Leasing Co. v. Geis 412 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Allstate Sales & Leasing Co. v. Geis 412 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cf. Adelman v. Onischuk, 271 Minn. 216, 228 , (in context of assessment challenges, a statutory remedy generally precludes resort to equity).
Zimmerman v. Lasky 374 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Zimmerman v. Lasky 374 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“If a statute * * * provides a remedy by appeal or otherwise, such remedy is generally exclusive and will preclude any resort to equity.” Adelman v. Onischuk, 271 Minn. 216, 228
Krahl v. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 283 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1979
Krahl v. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 283 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1979
As we recognized' in Adelman v. Omischuk, 271 Minn. 216, 220 , “[t]he board of managers has the powers necessary to deal with problems of water use.” See, also, City of North St.
Markwardt v. State, Water Resources Board 254 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1977
Markwardt v. State, Water Resources Board 254 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1977
Cf. Adelman v. Onischuk, 271 Minn. 216 , , certiorari denied, 382 U.S. 108 , 86 S.Ct.
Borom v. City of St. Paul 184 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1971
Borom v. City of St. Paul 184 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1971
Williams v. Rolfe, 257 Minn. 237 , 101 N. W. (2d) 923 ; AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc. 260 Minn. 499 , 110 N. W. (2d) 348 ; Adelman v. Onischuk, 271 Minn. 216 , 135 N. W. (2d) 670 .
Volunteers of America v. City of Minneapolis 154 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1967
Volunteers of America v. City of Minneapolis 154 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1967
As to the applicability of Rule 23, Rules of Civil Procedure, see Adelman v. Onischuk, 271 Minn. 216 , 135 N. W. (2d) 670 , certiorari denied, 382 U. S. 108 , 86 S. Ct. 257 , 15 L. ed. (2d) 192.
Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed District 153 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1967
Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed District 153 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1967
112.34, et seq., which we held constitutional in Adelman v. Onischuk, 271 Minn. 216 , 135 N. W. (2d) 670 , the Board of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District (hereinafter called Managers) held public hearings on the desirability of ordering the proposed project on February 29, March 7, 9, and 26, and April 4, 1964.