DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hare, 154 N.W.2d 820.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Galvan 912 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 2018
  • State v. Galvan 912 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 2018
    See Lodermeier , d at 398 (relying in part on the nature of the wounds to support a finding of premeditation); State v. Martin , , 345 (Minn. 1977) (noting that the brutality of a killing might not alone "be sufficient evidence of premeditation" but it could "be considered by the jury as supporting an inference that defendant premeditated to act"); State v. Hare , 278 Minn. 405 , , 822 (1967) (holding that aiming a firearm at a victim and firing multiple shots that hit the victim support an infe
  • State of Minnesota v. Anthony James Cox 884 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 2016
  • State v. Taylor 650 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 2002
  • State v. Taylor 650 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 2002
    See State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405, 408 , (holding inference of premeditation permissible from multiple gun shots).
  • State v. Thompson 544 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Thompson 544 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1996
    Though in Swain , multiple blows to the victim’s head by the defendant did not lead to a finding of premeditation, this court cited two cases, State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405 , in which multiple blows did support such a finding.
  • State v. Jackman 396 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Jackman 396 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1986
    See State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405, 408 , cert.
  • State v. Spurgin 358 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Spurgin 358 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1984
    See State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405 , cert, denied, 391 U.S. 925 , 88 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lloyd 345 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Lloyd 345 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1984
    State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405, 408 , cert.
  • State v. Swain 269 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Swain 269 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1978
    In State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405 , certiorari denied, 391 U.S. 925 , 88 S.Ct.
  • State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
    See, State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405 , 4 State v. Gowdy, 262 Minn. 70
  • State v. Martin 261 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Martin 261 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1977
    E. g., State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1 , State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405 , certiorari denied, 391 U.S. 925 , 88 S.Ct.
  • State v. King 176 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 1970
  • State v. King 176 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 1970
    Fruhrman v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 242 , 146 N. W. (2d) 174 ; State v. Ware, 267 Minn. 191 , 126 N. W. (2d) 429 ; State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405 , 154 N. W. (2d) 820 , certiorari denied, 391 U. S. 925 , 88 S. Ct. 1823 , 20 L. ed. (2d) 663.
  • State v. Hanson 176 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Hanson 176 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1970
    1 State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405 , 154 N. W. (2d) 820 , certiorari denied, 391 U. S. 925 , 88 S. Ct. 1823 , 20 L. ed. (2d) 663; State v. Ware, 267 Minn. 191 , 126 N. W. (2d) 429 ; State v. Towers, 106 Minn. 105 , .
  • State v. Hyleck 175 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Hyleck 175 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1970
    To implant in the mind of this jury a basis of prejudice, so that the jury will close its eyes to the law and to the facts.” 3 See, State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 12 , 161 N. W. (2d) 47, 55 ; State v. Keaton, 258 Minn. 359, 364 , 104 N. W. (2d) 650, 655 ; State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405, 407 , 145 N. W. (2d) 820 , 822; State v. Gowdy, 262 Minn. 70, 74 , 113 N. W. (2d) 578, 581 .
  • Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Campbell 161 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Campbell 161 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1968
    State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405 , 154 N. W. (2d) 820 .