DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite White v. Johnson, 137 N.W.2d 674.

33 citing documents.

  • Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 813 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 2012
  • Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 813 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 2012
    At common law, “liability is created at the instant [a] tort is committed.” White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363, 371 , overruled on other grounds by Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc., , 368 n. 11 (Minn.1977) (adopting comparative fault contribution).
  • In Re Individual 35w Bridge Litigation 786 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • In Re Individual 35w Bridge Litigation 786 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway, 235 Minn. 304 , the running of a statute of limitations against a co-tort-feasor, see Gustafson v. Johnson, 235 Minn. 358, 364 , failure to provide statutory notice to a municipal co-tortfeasor, see White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363, 372 , overruled on other grounds [;] Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc., -68 (1977); and failure to provide statutory notice to a dramshop defendant
  • Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. 548 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1996
  • Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. 548 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1996
    "Indemnity and contribution are both remedies based on equitable principles to secure restitution to one who has paid more than his just share of a liability.” White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363, 367
  • City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 512 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1994
  • City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 512 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1994
    See, e.g., White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363 , overruled on other grounds, Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc., , 368 n. 11 (Minn.1977) (adopting comparative fault contribution).
  • Blomgren v. Marshall Management Services, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • Blomgren v. Marshall Management Services, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    Common liability “is created at the instant the tort is committed.” White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363, 371 , overruled in part by Tolbert, d at 368 n. 11.
  • Friberg v. Fagen 404 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Friberg v. Fagen 404 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    The supreme court has stated that common liability “is created at the instant the tort is committed.” See Spitzack, 308 Minn. at 145 , d at 643 ; White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363, 371
  • Horton Ex Rel. Horton v. Orbeth, Inc. 342 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1984
  • Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe v. Blake 311 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1981
  • Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe v. Blake 311 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1981
    White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363, 371 , overruled in part, *5
  • Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
  • Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
    Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway, 235 Minn. 304 , the running of a statute of limitations against a co-tortfeasor, see Gustafson v. Johnson, 235 Minn. 358, 364 , failure to provide statutory notice to a municipal co-tort-feasor, see White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363, 372 , overruled on other grounds; Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc., -68 (1977); and failure to provide statutory notice to a dramshop defendant
  • Hammerschmidt v. Moore 274 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1978
  • Hammerschmidt v. Moore 274 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1978
    See also White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363 , (contribution claimant as well as directly injured party may provide the notice).
  • Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc. 255 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1977
  • Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc. 255 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1977
    Thill v. Modern Erecting Co., 272 Minn. 217 , White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363
  • Spitzack v. Schumacher 241 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1976
  • Spitzack v. Schumacher 241 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1976
    Common liability “is created at the instant the tort is committed.” White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363, 371
  • Hillman v. Ellingson 215 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1974
  • Hillman v. Ellingson 215 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1974
    In White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363, 368 , this court stated that “whether indemnity or contribution possibly lies in this case depends on the conduct of the two wrongdoers and the relative culpability of their actions.” As pointed out in 53 Minn. L. Rev. 1078 , 1082, “[t]his language seems to indicate the essentially equit
  • Bjorklund v. Hantz 208 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1973
  • Bjorklund v. Hantz 208 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1973
    1 See, also, Hanson v. Bailey, 249 Minn. 495, 506 , White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363, 368 , and Keefer v. Al Johnson Const. Co. 292 Minn. 91, 98
  • McGuire v. Hennessy 193 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1971
  • McGuire v. Hennessy 193 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1971
    account of any loss or injury within the scope of section 466.02 shall cause to be presented to the governing body of the municipality within 30 days after the alleged loss or injury a written notice stating the time, place and circumstances thereof, and the amount of compensation or other relief demanded.” Johnson Bros, gave the city no notice of claim, but on the authority of White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363 , rely on the adequacy of notice given the city by the Hennessys.
  • Almich v. Independent School District No. 393 190 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1971
  • Almich v. Independent School District No. 393 190 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1971
    Hirth v. Village of Long Prairie, supra; Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 287 Minn. 287 , Holsman v. Village of Bigfork, 284 Minn. 460 , White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363 , Jensen v. Downtown Auto Park, Inc. 289 Minn. 436
  • Larsen v. Minneapolis Gas Company 163 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1968
  • Larsen v. Minneapolis Gas Company 163 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1968
    “Answer: No.” 3 E. g., Roberts v. Donaldson, 276 Minn. 72 , 149 N. W. (2d) 401 ; Sjodin v. Lund, 277 Minn. 473 , 152 N. W. (2d) 718 ; Brasch v. Wesolowsky, 272 Minn. 112 , 138 N. W. (2d) 619 ; Thill v. Modern Erecting Co. 272 Minn. 217 , 136 N. W. (2d) 677 ; Daly v. Bergestedt, 267 Minn. 244 , 126 N. W. (2d) 242 ; Hanson v. Bailey, 249 Minn. 495 , 83 N. W. (2d) 252 ; cf. White v. Johnson, 272 Minn. 363 , 137 N. W. (2d) 674 .