Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Huber, 148 N.W.2d 137.

55 citing documents.

State v. Fagerstrom 176 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1970
See, Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U. S. 575 , 84 S. Ct. 841 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 921; Sam v. United States (10 Cir.) 385 F. (2d) 213; State v. Huber, 275 Minn. 475 , 148 N. W. (2d) 137 .
State v. Beltowski 160 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1968
State v. Beltowski 160 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1968
State v. Huber, 275 Minn. 475 , 148 N. W. (2d) 137 .
City of Minneapolis v. Price 159 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1968
City of Minneapolis v. Price 159 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1968
We agree that, even when viewed in light of the rule that a conviction will not be reversed for denial of a motion for continuance except when such denial was a clear abuse of discretion, State v. Huber, 275 Minn. 475 , 148 N. W. (2d) 137 ; State v. Mohrbacher, 173 Minn. 567 , , the denial here cannot be sustained.