Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. Tapper, 143 N.W.2d 215.

44 citing documents.

Sampair v. Village of Birchwood 784 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 2010
Sampair v. Village of Birchwood 784 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 2010
See, e.g., Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 177-80 , -26 (1966).
Lindberg v. Fasching 667 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Lindberg v. Fasching 667 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164,178-79 , -26 (1966).
Pergament v. Loring Properties, Ltd. 599 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1999
Pergament v. Loring Properties, Ltd. 599 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1999
See Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164 , 180 n. 3, , 226 n. 3 (1966); see also Werner v. Sample, 259 Minn. 273, 275 , (concluding that reference to an extinguished easement does not create or revive an easement, “it presupposes an existing easement”); United Parking Stations, Inc. v. Calvary Temple, 257 Minn. 273, 27
Swanson v. Parkway Estates Townhouse Ass'n 567 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Swanson v. Parkway Estates Townhouse Ass'n 567 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Trondson, d at 682 (citing Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 169 , ).
Goodhue State Bank v. Luhman 490 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Goodhue State Bank v. Luhman 490 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164,169
Weber v. Eisentrager 490 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Weber v. Eisentrager 490 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 177 , -25 (1966).
Trondson v. Janikula 458 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1990
Trondson v. Janikula 458 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1990
Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 169
Stiff v. Associated Sewing Supply Co. 436 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1989
Stiff v. Associated Sewing Supply Co. 436 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1989
Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 169-70
Kresko v. Rulli 432 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kresko v. Rulli 432 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 169
Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 169
Mitchell Feed & Seed, Inc. v. Mitchell 413 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mitchell Feed & Seed, Inc. v. Mitchell 413 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(citing Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164 , (review *850 ing court not required to reverse merely because findings could have been more detailed)).
In Re the Welfare of C.S.H. 408 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of C.S.H. 408 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 171
Ted Murr, Inc. v. Oberg 408 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ted Murr, Inc. v. Oberg 408 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 171
Georgens v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. 406 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Georgens v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. 406 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Id., citing Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 386 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1986
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 386 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1986
Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 170
Crockett v. Millers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois 323 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1982
Crockett v. Millers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois 323 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1982
It is the duty of this court to uphold such a finding unless it is “manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.” Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 170
Peterson v. Johnston 254 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1977
Peterson v. Johnston 254 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1977
Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164
Township of Sterling v. Griffin 244 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1976
Township of Sterling v. Griffin 244 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1976
In Wichelman v. Messner, 250 Minn. 88, 103 , we suggested that unregistered right-of-way easements are subject to extinguishment unless brought within the protection of the possession exception, and we have so applied the act in subsequent decisions, Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164 , United Parking Stations, Inc. v. Calvary Temple, 257 Minn. 273
Kortsan v. Poor Richards, Inc. 188 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 1971
Kortsan v. Poor Richards, Inc. 188 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 1971
See, generally, Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164 , 143 N. W. (2d) 215 .
Brownlee v. Ertzos 182 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 1970
Brekken v. Holien 182 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1970
Brekken v. Holien 182 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1970
Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164 , 143 N. W. (2d) 215 ; 1B Dunnell, Dig.
Brownlee v. Ertzos 182 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 1970
Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 ; Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 169 , 143 N. W. (2d) 215, 220 .
Scott-Daniels Properties, Inc. v. Dresser 160 N.W.2d 675 Minn. 1968
Scott-Daniels Properties, Inc. v. Dresser 160 N.W.2d 675 Minn. 1968
We said in Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 170 , 143 N. W. (2d) 215 , 220: “* * * In the trial of cases like this one [a trial before the court without a jury], the trial court has the primary responsibility of determining the fact issues, and in reviewing findings we are and should be guided by the fact that much must necessarily be left to the sound judgmen