Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jordan, 136 N.W.2d 601.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Dahlin, d at 588 (noting that a defendant can impliedly or expressly waive an instruction); see also State v. Jordan , (characterizing a defendant’s entitlement to an instruction on a warranted lesser-included offense as a “right”).
- State v. Dahlin 695 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 2005
-
State v. Dahlin
695 N.W.2d 588
Minn. 2005
The leading Minnesota cases addressing lesser-included offenses are State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , and State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414
- State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
-
State v. Auchampach
540 N.W.2d 808
Minn. 1995
State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84, 86
- Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
-
Bellcourt v. State
390 N.W.2d 269
Minn. 1986
As summarized in State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , : (a) A person prosecuted for a crime may be convicted either of the crime charged or an included crime, but not both.
- State v. Smith 374 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Smith
374 N.W.2d 520
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84, 86-87 , said: The right of the defendant to have such instructions given to the jury may be waived * * * expressly or * * * implicitly by failure to make proper request for such submission.
- State v. Nash 342 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Nash
342 N.W.2d 177
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The Minnesota Supreme Court listed five principles which apply when submitting lesser included offenses in State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , as follows: (a) A person prosecuted for a crime may be convicted either of the crime charged or an included crime, but not both.
- State v. Curtis 295 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1980
-
State v. Curtis
295 N.W.2d 253
Minn. 1980
See State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84, 86
- State v. Adams 295 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1980
-
State v. Adams
295 N.W.2d 527
Minn. 1980
See also State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84
- State v. Malley 285 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1979
-
State v. Malley
285 N.W.2d 469
Minn. 1979
In State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , we summarized the principles which should govern the submission of a lesser included offense.
- State v. Bryant 281 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1979
-
State v. Bryant
281 N.W.2d 712
Minn. 1979
See, State v. Leinwe *714 ber, supra; State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84
- State v. Swain 269 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1978
-
State v. Swain
269 N.W.2d 707
Minn. 1978
See, also, State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , and State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300
- State v. Gegenfurtner 251 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1977
-
State v. Gegenfurtner
251 N.W.2d 694
Minn. 1977
State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84
- State v. Malzac 244 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1976
-
State v. Malzac
244 N.W.2d 258
Minn. 1976
I The leading Minnesota cases on the issue of whether the jury should be instructed on lesser and included offenses are State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , and State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414
- State v. Walker 235 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1975
-
State v. Walker
235 N.W.2d 810
Minn. 1975
11 State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , State v. Pankratz, 238 Minn. 517
- State, Village of New Hope v. Eric Duplessie 231 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1975
-
State, Village of New Hope v. Eric Duplessie
231 N.W.2d 548
Minn. 1975
5 Pointer v. Texas, 380 U. S. 400 , 85 S. Ct. 1065 , 13 L. ed. 2d 923 (1965); State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , See, State v. Wiley, 295 Minn. 411
- State v. Leinweber 228 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1975
-
State v. Leinweber
228 N.W.2d 120
Minn. 1975
State v. Abdo, 149 Minn. 195 , State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84
- State v. Sobieck 216 N.W.2d 832 Minn. 1974
-
State v. Sobieck
216 N.W.2d 832
Minn. 1974
State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84, 86
- State v. Fulford 187 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1971
-
State v. Fulford
187 N.W.2d 270
Minn. 1971
In State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84, 86 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601, 603 , the criteria for submission of crimes different from the one with which the defendant has been charged have been exhaustively defined: “There are five principles which apply with respect to the submission of included crimes for consideration by the jury: “(a) A person prosecuted for a c
- State v. Keenan 184 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1971
-
State v. Keenan
184 N.W.2d 410
Minn. 1971
State v. Gavle, 234 Minn. 186 , 48 N. W. (2d) 44 ; State v. Jenkins, 171 Minn. 173 , ; State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601 .
- State v. Matousek 178 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1970
-
State v. Matousek
178 N.W.2d 604
Minn. 1970
State v. Gerou, 283 Minn. 298 , 168 N. W. (2d) 15 ; State v. Biehoffer, 269 Minn. 35 , 129 N. W. (2d) 918 ; State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601 ; State v. Voss, 192 Minn. 127 , .
- State v. Gafner 168 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1969
-
State v. Gafner
168 N.W.2d 680
Minn. 1969
The state cites State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601 , for the proposition that it is proper for the judge to weigh the evidence to determine whether it would justify a finding that defendant could have committed the lesser crime without committing the greater.
- State v. Gerou 168 N.W.2d 15 Minn. 1969
-
State v. Gerou
168 N.W.2d 15
Minn. 1969
See, also, State v. Biehoffer, 269 Minn. 35 , 129 N. W. (2d) 918 ; State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601 .
- State v. Beltowski 160 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1968
-
State v. Beltowski
160 N.W.2d 705
Minn. 1968
State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601 .
- State v. Walker 157 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1968
-
State v. Walker
157 N.W.2d 508
Minn. 1968
State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601 .
- State v. Dahlstrom 150 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1967
-
State v. Dahlstrom
150 N.W.2d 53
Minn. 1967
See, State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N.W.
- State v. Scalzo 147 N.W.2d 926 Minn. 1967