Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jordan, 136 N.W.2d 601.

51 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    See Dahlin, d at 588 (noting that a defendant can impliedly or expressly waive an instruction); see also State v. Jordan , (characterizing a defendant’s entitlement to an instruction on a warranted lesser-included offense as a “right”).
  • State v. Dahlin 695 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Dahlin 695 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 2005
    The leading Minnesota cases addressing lesser-included offenses are State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , and State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414
  • State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
    State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84, 86
  • Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
  • Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
    As summarized in State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , : (a) A person prosecuted for a crime may be convicted either of the crime charged or an included crime, but not both.
  • State v. Smith 374 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Smith 374 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    The Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84, 86-87 , said: The right of the defendant to have such instructions given to the jury may be waived * * * expressly or * * * implicitly by failure to make proper request for such submission.
  • State v. Nash 342 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Nash 342 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    The Minnesota Supreme Court listed five principles which apply when submitting lesser included offenses in State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , as follows: (a) A person prosecuted for a crime may be convicted either of the crime charged or an included crime, but not both.
  • State v. Curtis 295 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Curtis 295 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1980
    See State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84, 86
  • State v. Adams 295 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Adams 295 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1980
    See also State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84
  • State v. Malley 285 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Malley 285 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1979
    In State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , we summarized the principles which should govern the submission of a lesser included offense.
  • State v. Bryant 281 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Bryant 281 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1979
    See, State v. Leinwe *714 ber, supra; State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84
  • State v. Swain 269 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Swain 269 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1978
    See, also, State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , and State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300
  • State v. Gegenfurtner 251 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Gegenfurtner 251 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1977
    State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84
  • State v. Malzac 244 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Malzac 244 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1976
    I The leading Minnesota cases on the issue of whether the jury should be instructed on lesser and included offenses are State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , and State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414
  • State v. Walker 235 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Walker 235 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1975
    11 State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , State v. Pankratz, 238 Minn. 517
  • State, Village of New Hope v. Eric Duplessie 231 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1975
  • State, Village of New Hope v. Eric Duplessie 231 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1975
    5 Pointer v. Texas, 380 U. S. 400 , 85 S. Ct. 1065 , 13 L. ed. 2d 923 (1965); State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , See, State v. Wiley, 295 Minn. 411
  • State v. Leinweber 228 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Leinweber 228 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1975
    State v. Abdo, 149 Minn. 195 , State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84
  • State v. Sobieck 216 N.W.2d 832 Minn. 1974
  • State v. Sobieck 216 N.W.2d 832 Minn. 1974
    State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84, 86
  • State v. Fulford 187 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Fulford 187 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1971
    In State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84, 86 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601, 603 , the criteria for submission of crimes different from the one with which the defendant has been charged have been exhaustively defined: “There are five principles which apply with respect to the submission of included crimes for consideration by the jury: “(a) A person prosecuted for a c
  • State v. Keenan 184 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Keenan 184 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1971
    State v. Gavle, 234 Minn. 186 , 48 N. W. (2d) 44 ; State v. Jenkins, 171 Minn. 173 , ; State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601 .
  • State v. Matousek 178 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Matousek 178 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1970
    State v. Gerou, 283 Minn. 298 , 168 N. W. (2d) 15 ; State v. Biehoffer, 269 Minn. 35 , 129 N. W. (2d) 918 ; State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601 ; State v. Voss, 192 Minn. 127 , .
  • State v. Gafner 168 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Gafner 168 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1969
    The state cites State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601 , for the proposition that it is proper for the judge to weigh the evidence to determine whether it would justify a finding that defendant could have committed the lesser crime without committing the greater.
  • State v. Gerou 168 N.W.2d 15 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Gerou 168 N.W.2d 15 Minn. 1969
    See, also, State v. Biehoffer, 269 Minn. 35 , 129 N. W. (2d) 918 ; State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601 .
  • State v. Beltowski 160 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Beltowski 160 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1968
    State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601 .
  • State v. Walker 157 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Walker 157 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1968
    State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N. W. (2d) 601 .
  • State v. Dahlstrom 150 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Dahlstrom 150 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1967
    See, State v. Jordan, 272 Minn. 84 , 136 N.W.
  • State v. Scalzo 147 N.W.2d 926 Minn. 1967