Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Balts v. Balts, 142 N.W.2d 66.

41 citing documents.

Bentley S. Poitra, et al., Minn. 2021
See, –75 (Minn. 1966) (rejecting immunity for a child in a suit brought by a parent); (abrogating unenforceable.
Lickteig v. Kolar 782 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 2010
Lickteig v. Kolar 782 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 2010
See, (abrogating parental immunity); Beaudette v. Frana, 285 Minn. 366, 373 , (abrogating interspousal immunity); Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419, 430, 433 , 75 (1966) (rejecting immunity for a child in a suit brought by a parent, concluding that “public policy ...
McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC. 346 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1984
McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC. 346 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1984
Beaudette v. Frana, 285 Minn. 366 , Silesky v. Kelman, 281 Minn. 431 , Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ryan 330 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1983
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ryan 330 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1983
Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419, 433
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Stream 295 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1980
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Stream 295 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1980
These claims, which were found to be unpersuasive in the initial decision abrogating intrafamilial immunity, see Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419 , 4 (involving a child’s liability to his parents), are no more convincing today.
Romanik v. Toro Co. 277 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1979
Romanik v. Toro Co. 277 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1979
* * (1) Where the alleged negligent act involves an exercise of reasonable parental authority over the child; and (2) where the alleged negligent act involves an exercise of ordinary parental discretion with respect to the provision of food, clothing, housing, medical and dental services, and other care * * * Silesky v. Kelman, 281 Minn. 431, 442 , see, Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419
Milkovich v. Saari 203 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1973
Milkovich v. Saari 203 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1973
On April 1, 1966, our court handed down two decisions which indicated our determination to replace lex loci with a more rational choice-of-law methodology: Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419 , ; and Kopp v. Rechtzigel, 273 Minn. 441 , .
Allen v. Gannaway 199 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1972
Allen v. Gannaway 199 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1972
Beginning with Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419 , and followed in Kopp v. Rechtzigel, 273 Minn. 441 , Schneider v. Nichols, 280 Minn. 139 , and Bolgrean v. Stich, 293 Minn. 8 , we abandoned the lex loci delicti theory, at least where the facts bring the case within th
Bolgrean v. Stich 196 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1972
Bolgrean v. Stich 196 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1972
4 Schneider v. Nichols, 280 Minn. 139 , Kopp v. Rechtzigel, 273 Minn. 441 , Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419
Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 193 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1971
Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 193 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1971
No. 621, 264 Minn. 279 , and Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419
Streenz v. Streenz 471 P.2d 282 Ariz. 1970
B. F. Griebenow, Inc. v. Anderson 177 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1970
B. F. Griebenow, Inc. v. Anderson 177 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1970
2 The quoted language of Weber is indistinguishable from the language employed in Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419, 431 , 142 N. W. (2d) 66, 73 , which prospectively overruled the immunity of a child from suit by a parent in a tort action: “* * * It is unjust to expose to liability without notice those who have relied on existing law in conducting their affairs.
Schultz v. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. 175 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1970
Schultz v. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. 175 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1970
This was the approach used in Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419 , 142 N. W. (2d) 66 (tort action by parent against child); Silesky v. Kelman, supra (tort action by child against parent); and Beaudette v. Frana, 285 Minn. 366 , 173 N. W. (2d) 416 (interspousal tort suit).
Streenz v. Streenz 461 P.2d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Eicher v. Jones 173 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1970
Eicher v. Jones 173 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1970
Somewhat earlier, in Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419 , 142 N. W. (2d) 66 (1966), this court had partially abrogated the rule by allowing recovery in a tort action by a parent against his unemancipated minor child.
Beaudette v. Frana 173 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1969
Beaudette v. Frana 173 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1969
Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419 , 142 N. W. (2d) 66 , decided April 1,1966, abrogated the immunity of an unemancipated child from an action by his parent for personal injuries resulting from the child’s negligence in driving an automobile.
Peterson v. City of Minneapolis 173 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1969
Peterson v. City of Minneapolis 173 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1969
In Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419 , 142 N. W. (2d) 66 , we abolished the rule that a child is immune from suit by the parent arising out of a tort action.
Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 170 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1969
Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 170 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1969
No. 621, 264 Minn. 279 , , and Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419 , 142 N.W.
Schwartz v. Schwartz 447 P.2d 254 Ariz. 1968
Silesky Ex Rel. Silesky v. Kelman 161 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1968
Silesky Ex Rel. Silesky v. Kelman 161 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1968
It is undisputed that prior to this court’s decision in Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419 , 142 N. W. (2d) 66 , an unemancipated child could not maintain an action in tort against his parent.
Purcell v. Frazer 435 P.2d 736 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Hovanetz v. Anderson 148 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1967
Hovanetz v. Anderson 148 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1967
Although an inclination to reexamine the rule may have been indicated recently in Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419, 433 , 142 N. W. (2d) 66, 75 , we were not there confronted with repudiating prior decisions, and we cau *544 fioned that our decision permitting a suit by a parent against a child was not to be understood as “intimating the abrogation of tort immunity in actions by a child against a parent or between husband and wife
Kopp v. Rechtzigel 141 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1966
Kopp v. Rechtzigel 141 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1966
1 For reasons stated in Balts v. Balts, 273 Minn. 419 , 142 N. W. (2d) 66 , filed herewith, we hold that the South Dakota statute does not govern the question of liability.