Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Klotter, 142 N.W.2d 568.

41 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Firkus Minn. 2026
  • State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Firkus Minn. 2026
    At that time, we described the standard for deciding a defendant’s motion for a directed verdict as whether “there was evidence from which the jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant participated in the crime.”
  • Pierson v. State 637 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 2002
  • Pierson v. State 637 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 2002
    See, -99 (Minn.1995) (discussing criminal defendant’s challenge to the admissibility of evidence of defendant’s participation in other crimes); State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 62-63 , -72 (1966) (same); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 490-97 , -73 (1965) (same).
  • Kresko v. Rulli 432 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Kresko v. Rulli 432 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 63
  • Shannon v. State 379 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Shannon v. State 379 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    In State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , the supreme court stated that in order for an appellate court to reverse a trial court’s refusal to grant a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, [i]t must be shown that the evidence could not have been discovered before trial by due diligence and that the newly discovered evide
  • State v. Hagen 361 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Hagen 361 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    (quoting State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 64 , ).
  • State v. Swanson 353 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Swanson 353 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1984
    State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 64
  • State v. Jacobson 326 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Jacobson 326 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 1982
    State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 64
  • State v. Caldwell 322 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Caldwell 322 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1982
    See, State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 64
  • Vikse v. Flaby 316 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1982
  • Vikse v. Flaby 316 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1982
    See, State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 64 , Brown v. Bertrand, 254 Minn. 175, 180-85 , -51 (1959).
  • Martin v. State 295 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1980
  • Martin v. State 295 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1980
    State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58
  • State v. Hill 253 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Hill 253 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1977
    547.01 (4); State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , State v. Wheat, 166 Minn. 300
  • State v. Meldahl 245 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Meldahl 245 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1976
    State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , 14A Dunnell, Dig.
  • State v. Turner 239 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Turner 239 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1976
    State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58
  • State v. Dinneen 220 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1974
  • State v. Dinneen 220 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1974
    State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 62 , cited in State v. Saucedo, 294 Minn. 289, 292 , State v. Wofford, supra.
  • Whelan v. State 214 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1974
  • Whelan v. State 214 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1974
    547.01(4); State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , State v. Wheat, 166 Minn. 300
  • State v. Saucedo 200 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Saucedo 200 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1972
    develops the particular exception relied upon by the state in the present case, noting at 262 Minn. 118 , , that— “* * * where two or more offenses are linked together in point of time or circumstances so that one cannot be fully shown without proving the other, or where evidence of other crimes constitutes part of the res gestae, it is admissible.” See, also, State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 62 , wherein we observed: * * Evidence of a separate crime may be admitted if it has a reasonably close r
  • State v. Taylor 187 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Taylor 187 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1971
    State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , 142 N. W. (2d) 568 ; State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 .
  • State v. Lipscomb 183 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Lipscomb 183 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1971
    State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , 142 N. W. (2d) 568 ; State v. Ward, 225 Minn. 208 , 30 N. W. (2d) 349 ; State v. Brehmer, 281 Minn. 156 , 160 N. W. (2d) 669 .
  • State v. Hawn 182 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Hawn 182 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1970
    State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , 142 N. W. (2d) 568 .
  • State v. Mastrian 171 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Mastrian 171 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1969
    State v. Brehmer, 281 Minn. 156 , 160 N. W. (2d) 669 ; State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , 142 N. W. (2d) 568 .
  • State v. Sorg 144 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1966