Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Klotter, 142 N.W.2d 568.
- State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Firkus Minn. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Firkus
Minn. 2026
At that time, we described the standard for deciding a defendant’s motion for a directed verdict as whether “there was evidence from which the jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant participated in the crime.”
- Pierson v. State 637 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 2002
-
Pierson v. State
637 N.W.2d 571
Minn. 2002
See, -99 (Minn.1995) (discussing criminal defendant’s challenge to the admissibility of evidence of defendant’s participation in other crimes); State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 62-63 , -72 (1966) (same); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 490-97 , -73 (1965) (same).
- Kresko v. Rulli 432 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Kresko v. Rulli
432 N.W.2d 764
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 63
- Shannon v. State 379 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Shannon v. State
379 N.W.2d 205
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , the supreme court stated that in order for an appellate court to reverse a trial court’s refusal to grant a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, [i]t must be shown that the evidence could not have been discovered before trial by due diligence and that the newly discovered evide
- State v. Hagen 361 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Hagen
361 N.W.2d 407
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(quoting State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 64 , ).
- State v. Swanson 353 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1984
-
State v. Swanson
353 N.W.2d 128
Minn. 1984
State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 64
- State v. Jacobson 326 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 1982
-
State v. Jacobson
326 N.W.2d 663
Minn. 1982
State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 64
- State v. Caldwell 322 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1982
-
State v. Caldwell
322 N.W.2d 574
Minn. 1982
See, State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 64
- Vikse v. Flaby 316 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1982
-
Vikse v. Flaby
316 N.W.2d 276
Minn. 1982
See, State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 64 , Brown v. Bertrand, 254 Minn. 175, 180-85 , -51 (1959).
- Martin v. State 295 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1980
-
Martin v. State
295 N.W.2d 76
Minn. 1980
State v. Mastrian, 285 Minn. 51 , State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58
- State v. Hill 253 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1977
-
State v. Hill
253 N.W.2d 378
Minn. 1977
547.01 (4); State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , State v. Wheat, 166 Minn. 300
- State v. Meldahl 245 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1976
-
State v. Meldahl
245 N.W.2d 252
Minn. 1976
State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , 14A Dunnell, Dig.
- State v. Turner 239 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1976
-
State v. Turner
239 N.W.2d 468
Minn. 1976
State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58
- State v. Dinneen 220 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1974
-
State v. Dinneen
220 N.W.2d 292
Minn. 1974
State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 62 , cited in State v. Saucedo, 294 Minn. 289, 292 , State v. Wofford, supra.
- Whelan v. State 214 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1974
-
Whelan v. State
214 N.W.2d 344
Minn. 1974
547.01(4); State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , State v. Wheat, 166 Minn. 300
- State v. Saucedo 200 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1972
-
State v. Saucedo
200 N.W.2d 37
Minn. 1972
develops the particular exception relied upon by the state in the present case, noting at 262 Minn. 118 , , that— “* * * where two or more offenses are linked together in point of time or circumstances so that one cannot be fully shown without proving the other, or where evidence of other crimes constitutes part of the res gestae, it is admissible.” See, also, State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58, 62 , wherein we observed: * * Evidence of a separate crime may be admitted if it has a reasonably close r
- State v. Taylor 187 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1971
-
State v. Taylor
187 N.W.2d 129
Minn. 1971
State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , 142 N. W. (2d) 568 ; State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 .
- State v. Lipscomb 183 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1971
-
State v. Lipscomb
183 N.W.2d 790
Minn. 1971
State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , 142 N. W. (2d) 568 ; State v. Ward, 225 Minn. 208 , 30 N. W. (2d) 349 ; State v. Brehmer, 281 Minn. 156 , 160 N. W. (2d) 669 .
- State v. Hawn 182 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1970
-
State v. Hawn
182 N.W.2d 712
Minn. 1970
State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , 142 N. W. (2d) 568 .
- State v. Mastrian 171 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1969
-
State v. Mastrian
171 N.W.2d 695
Minn. 1969
State v. Brehmer, 281 Minn. 156 , 160 N. W. (2d) 669 ; State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , 142 N. W. (2d) 568 .
- State v. Sorg 144 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1966