DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hoffman v. Naslund, 144 N.W.2d 580.

35 citing documents.

  • Hoven v. Rice Memorial Hospital 386 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Hoven v. Rice Memorial Hospital 386 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Although the Minnesota Supreme Court made statements that tend to support this position in Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521, 530 , this clearly is not the law in Minnesota.
  • Warrick v. Giron 290 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1980
  • Warrick v. Giron 290 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1980
    See Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521, 529
  • Olson Ex Rel. Olson v. St. Joseph's Hospital 281 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1979
  • Olson Ex Rel. Olson v. St. Joseph's Hospital 281 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1979
    In reaching its conclusion, the trial court relied on a number of Minnesota decisions, including Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109 , Wallstedt v. Swedish Hospital,” 220 Minn. 274 , and Collings v. Northwestern Hospital, 202 Minn. 139 , 277 N.W.
  • Cornfeldt v. Tongen 262 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1977
  • Cornfeldt v. Tongen 262 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1977
    See, Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521, 531 , overruled on other grounds by Anderson v. Florence, 288 Minn. 351 , .
  • Utica Mutual Insurance v. Emmco Insurance 243 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1976
  • Utica Mutual Insurance v. Emmco Insurance 243 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1976
    See, Anderson v. Florence, 288 Minn. 351 , reversing Ericksen v. Wilson, 266 Minn. 401 , and Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521
  • Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic & Professional Associates 242 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1976
  • Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic & Professional Associates 242 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1976
    See, Hestbeck v. Hennepin County, 297 Minn. 419 , Jensen v. Linner, 260 Minn. 22 , Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , Yates v. Gamble, 198 Minn. 7 , Wallstedt v. The Swedish Hospital, 220 Minn. 274
  • City of Eveleth v. Ruble 225 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1974
  • City of Eveleth v. Ruble 225 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1974
    Co. 361 U. S. 354 , 80 S. Ct. 387 , 4 L. ed. 2d 366 (1960); Hestbeck v. Hennepin County, 297 Minn. 419 , Silver v. Redleaf, 292 Minn. 463 , Swanson v. Chatterton, supra; Schulz v. Feigal, supra; Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109 , Jensen v. Linner, supra; Wallstedt v. Swedish Hospital, 220 Minn. 274 , Quickstad v. Tavenner, supra; Johnson v. Arndt, 186 Minn. 253 , Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 173 Minn. 215
  • Bryan v. Luverne Community Hospital 217 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1974
  • Hestbeck v. Hennepin County 212 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1973
  • Hestbeck v. Hennepin County 212 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1973
    See, Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109
  • Larson v. Belzer Clinic 195 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1972
  • Larson v. Belzer Clinic 195 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1972
    The trial court declined to continue the case or to follow the rule applied by Judge Nicholson, which we later sustained, and adhered to our holding in Ericksen v. Wilson, 266 Minn. 401 , and Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , overruled by us in the Anderson decision.
  • Silver v. Redleaf 194 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1972
  • Silver v. Redleaf 194 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1972
    Yates v. Gamble, 198 Minn. 7, 12 , Berkholz v. Benepe, 153 Minn. 335, 337 , Moeller v. Hauser, 237 Minn. 368, 376 , Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 70 , Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521, 531 , Swanson v. Chatterton, 281 Minn. 129, 134
  • Mulder v. Parke Davis & Company 181 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1970
  • Mulder v. Parke Davis & Company 181 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1970
    2 Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521, 531 , 144 N. W. (2d) 580, 589 .
  • Anderson v. Florence 181 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1970
  • Anderson v. Florence 181 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1970
    irculatory problem in the leg involved.” *354 This form of pretrial discovery rather than that of oral deposition was chosen by prearrangement of counsel to accommodate defendant physician and to accomplish plaintiff’s announced purpose of laying a foundation for obtaining a reconsideration of our rule, enunciated in Ericksen v. Wilson, 266 Minn. 401 , 123 N. W. (2d) 687 , and Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , 144 N. W. (2d) 580 , which prohibits cross-examining a defendant physician in a medi
  • Marshall v. Co-Operative Oil Co. of Olmsted County 169 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1969
  • Marshall v. Co-Operative Oil Co. of Olmsted County 169 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1969
    See, Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , 144 N. W. (2d) 580 .
  • Okrina v. Midwestern Corporation 165 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1969
  • Okrina v. Midwestern Corporation 165 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1969
    Co. 255 Minn. 19 , 95 N. W. (2d) 497 ; and Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , 144 N. W. (2d) 580 .
  • Miller v. Tongen 161 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1968
  • Miller v. Tongen 161 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1968
    Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109 , 139 N. W. (2d) 877 ; Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , 144 N. W. (2d) 580 .
  • Swanson Ex Rel. Swanson v. Chatterton 160 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1968
  • Swanson Ex Rel. Swanson v. Chatterton 160 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1968
    expert testimony, as summarized in Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109, 115 , 139 N. W. (2d) 877, 880 , “there was no doubt about the cause of the result complained of, and the result would not have followed in the absence of a breach of duty, the establishment of which did not involve any scientific knowledge.” 3 Fritz v. Parke Davis & Co. 277 Minn. 210 , 152 N. W. (2d) 129 ; Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , 144 N. W. (2d) 580 ; Schulz v. Feigal, 273 Minn. 470 , 142 N. W. (2d) 84 ; Miller v.
  • Fritz v. Parke Davis and Company 152 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1967
  • Fritz v. Parke Davis and Company 152 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1967
    6 See, Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , 144 N. W. (2d) 580 .