Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Village of Hewitt, 143 N.W.2d 230.

27 citing documents.

Frederick S. Fish, Minn. 2019
of Hewitt, d 230, 233 (Minn. 1966); see also Waldref v. Dow, 214 N.W.
Hedged Investment Partners, L.P. v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. 578 N.W.2d 765 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Hedged Investment Partners, L.P. v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. 578 N.W.2d 765 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Exchange v. Village of Hewitt, 274 Minn. 246, 253
Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
v. Village of Hewitt, 274 Minn. 246, 249 , ).
City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 512 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1994
City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 512 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1994
v. Village of Hewitt, 274 Minn. 246, 249
Claude v. Collins 507 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Claude v. Collins 507 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Exchange v. Village of Hewitt, 274 Minn. 246, 258 , (“Willful negligence” suggests a reckless failure to exercise ordinary care.).
Blomgren v. Marshall Management Services, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Blomgren v. Marshall Management Services, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
v. Village of Hewitt, 274 Minn. 246, 249
Moose Club v. LaBounty 442 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Moose Club v. LaBounty 442 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Village of Hewitt, 274 Minn. 246, 251
Pautz v. Cal-Ros, Inc. 340 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1983
Pautz v. Cal-Ros, Inc. 340 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1983
As we pointed out in Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Village of Hewitt, 274 Minn. 246, 249 , “Contribution rests on common liability, not on joint negligence or joint tort.
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
Exchange v. Village of Hewitt, 274 Minn. 246 , , that an automobile liability insurer of an intoxicated driver who has paid bodily injury damages to a third person injured by the negligence of the intoxicated driver has a right to recover contribution from a liquor vendor who, by illegally furnishing liquor, caused the intoxication of the driver.
Lange Ex Rel. Lange v. Schweitzer 295 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1980
Lange Ex Rel. Lange v. Schweitzer 295 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1980
v. Village of Hewitt, 274 Minn. 246
Reserve Insurance v. Village of Big Lake 230 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1975
Reserve Insurance v. Village of Big Lake 230 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1975
Exchange v. Village of Hewitt, 274 Minn. 246 , we held that the insurer of a negligent driver which settled claims arising out of an automobile accident could seek contribution under the Civil Damage Act from liquor vendors who caused the insured automobile driver to become intoxicated.
Milbank Mutual Insurance v. Village of Rose Creek 225 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1974
Milbank Mutual Insurance v. Village of Rose Creek 225 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1974
Exchange v. Village of Hewitt, 274 Minn. 246 , that an automobile liability insurer of an intoxicated driver who has paid bodily injury damages to a third person injured by the negligence of the intoxicated driver has a right to recover contribution from a liquor vendor who, by illegally furnishing liquor, caused the intoxication of the
Samuelson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad 178 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1970
Samuelson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad 178 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1970
v. Village of Hewitt, 274 Minn. 246 , 143 N. W. (2d) 230 ; Employers Mutual Cas.
Skaja v. Andrews Hotel Company 161 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1968
Skaja v. Andrews Hotel Company 161 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1968
v. Village of Hewitt, 274 Minn. 246 , 143 N. W. (2d) 230 , he concluded that the mere making of illegal sales by two vendors causing intoxication and damage bars contribution between such illegal sellers.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by