DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mathiasen, 141 N.W.2d 805.

32 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
  • State of Minnesota v. Vennie Jerome Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Vennie Jerome Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    in violation of any one or more of the [specified] provisions within any six month period may be aggregated and the defendant charged accordingly.” (quoting 1978 version of section 609.52, subdivision 3(5), and noting that supreme court upheld the constitutionality of the statute in State v. Mathiasen, 273 Minn. 372, 378–79, ).
  • In Re the Welfare of C.P.K. 615 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • In Re the Welfare of C.P.K. 615 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    State v. Mathiasen, 273 Minn. 372, 378
  • State v. Miner 556 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Miner 556 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
    State v. Mathiasen, 278 Minn. 872 , 378
  • State, City of Mankato v. Chirpich 392 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State, City of Mankato v. Chirpich 392 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Mathiasen, 273 Minn. 372
  • State v. Hanson 285 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Hanson 285 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1979
    3(5) (1978), provides in part that “in any prosecution under [various statutory provisions] the value of the money or property received by the defendant in violation of any one or more of the above provisions within any six month period may be aggregated and the defendant charged accordingly.” We upheld the constitutionality of this statute in State v. Mathiasen, 273 Minn. 372
  • State v. Forsman 260 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Forsman 260 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1977
    918 (1937); State v. Mathiasen, 273 Minn. 372
  • State v. Kalvig 209 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Ott 189 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Ott 189 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1971
    See, State v. Mathiasen, 273 Minn. 372 , 141 N. W. (2d) 805 .
  • Coolen v. State 179 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1970
  • Coolen v. State 179 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1970
    See, Adler v. State, supra; State v. Roberts, supra; State v. Mathiasen, 273 Minn. 372 , 141 N. W. (2d) 805 .
  • State v. Everson 175 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Everson 175 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1970
    State v. Mathiasen, 273 Minn. 372 , 141 N. W. (2d) 805 .
  • Adler v. State 169 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1969
  • Adler v. State 169 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1969
    State v. Mathiasen, 273 Minn. 372 , 141 N. W. (2d) 805 .
  • State v. Fleck 161 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Fleck 161 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1968
    3(4), the constitutionality of which was upheld in State v. Harris, supra, and State v. Mathiasen, 273 Minn. 372 , 141 N. W. (2d) 805 , provided: “In all other cases where the value of the property or services is $100 or less, to imprisonment for not more than 90 days or to payment of a fine of not more than $100, provided, however, in any prosecution under *250 clause (3) (a) of subdivision 2 hereunder the value of the money or
  • State v. Roberts 156 N.W.2d 760 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Roberts 156 N.W.2d 760 Minn. 1968
    See, State v. Mathiasen, 273 Minn. 372 , 141 N. W. (2d) 805 ; cf. State v. Mickens, 276 Minn. 343 , 150 N. W. (2d) 30 ; State v. Blankenship, 277 Minn. 32 , 151 N. W. (2d) 410 ; see, also, State v. Ferraro, 277 Minn. 204 , 152 N. W. (2d) 183 ; State v. Waldron, 273 Minn. 57 , 139 N. W. (2d) 785 ; State v. Lund, 277 Minn. 90 , 151 N. W. (2d) 769 ; State ex
  • State Ex Rel. Oney v. Tahash 152 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1967
  • State Ex Rel. Oney v. Tahash 152 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1967
    The validity of this statute was sustained in State v. Mathiasen, 273 Minn. 372 , 141 N. W. (2d) 805 .
  • State v. Harris 152 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Harris 152 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1967
    In State v. Mathiasen, 273 Minn. 372 , 141 N. W. (2d) 805 , which was decided subsequent to the trial court’s certification in the present case, we determined that the sections here considered are not unconstitutionally vague.
  • Phillips v. St. Paul Human & Civil Rights Commission 151 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1967
  • Phillips v. St. Paul Human & Civil Rights Commission 151 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1967
    273 Minn. 372 , 141 N. W. (2d) 506 .