Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. Tahash, 141 N.W.2d 3.

212 citing documents.

Simberg v. State 179 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 1970
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 .
In Re Welfare of Spencer 179 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1970
In Re Welfare of Spencer 179 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1970
Easmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 , is required in such juvenile court proceedings.
State v. Kinn 178 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1970
State v. Hall 176 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1970
State v. Clark 176 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1970
State v. Clark 176 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1970
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539, 556 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 , 14: “The procedure which we have outlined deals only with evidence obtained as the result of a search and seizure and evidence consisting of or produced by confessions on the part of the defendant.
State v. Hall 176 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1970
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 .
State v. King 176 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 1970
State v. King 176 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 1970
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 , it seems quite clear that defendant is suffering from a serious mental disorder.
State v. Hanson 176 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1970
State v. Hanson 176 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1970
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 .
State v. Morales 176 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1970
State v. Morales 176 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1970
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 , but also to sustain the burden of proving compliance with Fourth Amendment, rights.
State v. Beers 176 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1970
State v. Beers 176 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1970
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 .
City of St. Paul v. Page 173 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1969
City of St. Paul v. Page 173 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1969
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 ; and, second, whether the evidence sustains a finding of guilty.
State v. Doust 173 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1969
State v. Doust 173 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1969
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539, 553 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3,13 , where the court stated: “At the time of arraignment when a defendant pleads not guilty, or as soon as possible thereafter, the state will advise the court as to whether its *343 case against the defendant will include * * * confessions or statements in the nature of confessions.” At the ar
State v. Capelle 172 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1969
State v. Capelle 172 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1969
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 , the testimony was in conflict as to whether defendant had given his consent to the extraction of blood for the purpose of making a test to determine its alcoholic content.
State v. Mitchell 172 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1969
State v. Mitchell 172 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1969
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 , which was considered by the trial court as a motion for suppression of evidence.
Swanson v. State 169 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1969
Swanson v. State 169 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1969
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 , correctly stating that Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643 , 81 S. Ct. 1684 , 6 L. ed. (2d) 1081, 84 A. L. R. (2d) 933, was not retroactive.
State v. Gerberding 162 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1968
State v. Gerberding 162 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1968
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 .
State v. Renfrew 159 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 1968
State v. Renfrew 159 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 1968
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 , and by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U. S. 368 , 84 S. Ct. 1774 , 12 L. ed. (2d) 908, 1 A. L. R. (3d) 1205.
State v. DeSchoatz 157 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1968
State v. DeSchoatz 157 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1968
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. [2d] 3) wherein defendant moved for disclosure of the identity of the informant or informants whose information *5 was the basis for the search warrant and to suppress the evidence seized as a result of the search of defendant’s apartment.
State v. Fields 157 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1968
State v. Fields 157 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1968
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539, 552 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3, 12 .
State v. King 156 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1968
State v. King 156 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1968
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 .
State v. Williams 155 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1968
State v. Williams 155 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1968
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 .
State Ex Rel. Hershenhorn v. Tahash 152 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1967
State Ex Rel. Hershenhorn v. Tahash 152 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1967
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 , in the following respects: (a) The affirmative conduct of the police officials in obtaining the oral confession through the ruse of advising petitioner that they had permission from his attorney to question him about the crime in question, whereas the permission was granted' for other purposes not
State v. Kotka 152 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1967
State v. Kotka 152 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1967
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 ; State ex rel.
State v. Sutton 152 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1967
Distinguished State v. Sutton 152 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1967
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539, 547 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3, 9 .
State v. Linehan 150 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1967
State v. Linehan 150 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1967
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 (same).
State v. Bristol 149 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1967
State v. Bristol 149 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1967
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 , and certified by the trial judge as a “doubtful question” is an appealable order.
State v. Poelakker 148 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1967
State v. Poelakker 148 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1967
Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 , 141 N. W. (2d) 3 .